From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32008 invoked from network); 15 May 2004 09:29:39 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 15 May 2004 09:29:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BOvUB-0003tM-B8 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 May 2004 09:29:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 1133 invoked by uid 50004); 15 May 2004 09:29:38 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 5176 invoked from network); 15 May 2004 09:29:38 +0000 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1084563698.23936.165.camel@localhost> References: <1084537866.23936.44.camel@localhost> <1084542037.23934.54.camel@localhost> <200405141114.01880.lv@gentoo.org> <1084563698.23936.165.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-D6gmTvw9jY2FCMwsC13M" Message-Id: <1084616250.2276.15.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 04:29:21 -0500 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.40 X-Apparently-From: SPYDEROUS@aol.com X-AOL-IP: 205.188.118.17 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Question about xfree86-4.3.0-r6 X-Archives-Salt: 114a09f9-4446-4da8-ab54-9cb48f446149 X-Archives-Hash: 16a5113903f58951d35a9932d235d251 --=-D6gmTvw9jY2FCMwsC13M Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 14:41, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 11:14, lv@dev.gentoo.org wrote: > > it's masked due to a bug in portage that is apparently not being fixed = ("you=20 > > shouldnt be using that anyway" is the response we got to the bug). if b= oth=20 > > xorg-x11 and this xfree are unmasked, for some reason an attempt to ins= tall=20 > > one will try to install the other. xorg-x11 is stable on amd64... > >=20 > > i'm not on the xfree herd, but i remember this being a PITA on amd64. >=20 > I guess this also brings up the question, when is xorg-x11 going to be > stable on each arch and when will it be the default for the virtual? I > know that we are eventually going that way, which was the reasoning > behind me supporting both. Once some pesky xkb problems are tracked down. Maybe a few other things too like the opengl-update issue I mentioned elsewhere in this thread as well. --=20 Donnie Berkholz Gentoo Linux --=-D6gmTvw9jY2FCMwsC13M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBApe46XVaO67S1rtsRAnn9AKCbpEkjvieYF0R+XZsSLOs4HstpUwCfa7Th Lknk8KoRKrL4oPqZp+ng90c= =euKL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-D6gmTvw9jY2FCMwsC13M--