From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-12390-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 30635 invoked from network); 12 May 2004 14:43:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 May 2004 14:43:58 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BNuxh-0003z5-Rc for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:43:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 32624 invoked by uid 50004); 12 May 2004 14:43:57 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 11333 invoked from network); 12 May 2004 14:43:57 +0000 From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> Reply-To: wolf31o2@gentoo.org To: Kevin <gentoo-dev@gnosys.biz> Cc: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200405120958.45686.gentoo-dev@gnosys.biz> References: <200405111407.58909.gentoo-dev@gnosys.biz> <200405120724.07569.gentoo-dev@gnosys.biz> <20040512114822.GD16857%jmglov@jmglov.net> <200405120958.45686.gentoo-dev@gnosys.biz> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-V9XWjeUZWzwwZCr5nQ09" Organization: Gentoo Linux Message-Id: <1084373069.7729.55.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 10:44:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Major MCE problem with SMP on Gentoo kernels X-Archives-Salt: 8f584488-2137-4092-b009-bea61a8d912e X-Archives-Hash: 7cea519708abb6897ecea5b095c9e9ef --=-V9XWjeUZWzwwZCr5nQ09 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 09:58, Kevin wrote: > Oh.... Well, that seems like an important difference between yours and m= y=20 > arrangements. Are you running Gentoo on a box with more than one=20 > physical CPU? I had no problems running Gentoo on this box until after=20 > installing a second CPU. That's when the weirdness started. >=20 > Is anyone here running Gentoo on a dual-physical CPU machine? What=20 > compiler flags are you using? I am running Gentoo on several dual-CPU machines, and even one quad-CPU machine with no troubles at all. CFLAGS=3D"-march=3Dpentium4 -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" > > > FEATURES=3D"autoaddcvs ccache distcc sandbox" >=20 > Huh. That's odd. When I installed distcc, I changed the FEATURES as=20 > indicated in the docs to list distcc, but I didn't add any of those=20 > others. Wonder where they came from... They came from the defaults. Unless you set -autoaddcvs, etc in your FEATURES. There's no need to try to remove autoaddcvs, since it just won't work. > I was thinking "number of physical CPUs + 1" here, but ok. You would probably get a speed boost going with -j5 rather than -j3, but I would bench it myself before trusting anything from an external source. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team Is your power animal a penguin? --=-V9XWjeUZWzwwZCr5nQ09 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAojhNkT4lNIS36YERAqcHAKCFc3yxh0paZt5atuFy+jZhFUb12wCfbC56 mL8tPDLCKdA05h/sOqzaVGw= =S7CP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-V9XWjeUZWzwwZCr5nQ09--