From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30345 invoked from network); 7 May 2004 16:34:00 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 May 2004 16:34:00 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BM8IS-0004jA-Pw for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 May 2004 16:34:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 23584 invoked by uid 50004); 7 May 2004 16:33:34 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19940 invoked from network); 7 May 2004 16:33:34 +0000 From: Chris Gianelloni To: splite-gentoo@sigint.cs.purdue.edu Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20040504162509.GD7040@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> References: <20040502173223.GA7160@linux1.home> <20040503162436.GA1938@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> <20040504153724.GC7040@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> <20040504162509.GD7040@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1083947609.9268.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 12:33:29 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: strange gentoo shutdown sequence X-Archives-Salt: 726e05a3-a51b-412e-972c-22f019efea5c X-Archives-Hash: 4e999223bc27d6479566dba33823e5ec On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 12:25, splite-gentoo@sigint.cs.purdue.edu wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 05:59:25PM +0200, Sven K?hler wrote: > > >I don't know; I don't use RHL or RHEL. However, I suspect they work just > > >as Gentoo does. init(8) first signals the processes in its process group, > > >so you'll see: > > > > > >INIT: Switching to runlevel 0 > > >INIT: Sending processes the TERM signal > > >INIT: Sending processes the KILL signal > > > > > >on the console. Then init runs the RHL shutdown scripts, the final one of > > >which probably sends all processes SIGTERM and SIGKILL, just like Gentoo's > > >/etc/init.d/halt.sh does. > > > > No, you first see the init-scripts shutting down all the services, and > > than you see the TERM/KILL stuff. > > *shrug* Maybe they kludged init so they wouldn't get support calls asking > why processes were being killed before the shutdown scripts ran. It is patched out. I used to do the same thing with Slackware/LFS boxes simply because it made for fewer questions from users. You can always grab the .src.rpm and look at what patches they use yourself. -- Chris Gianelloni Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team Is your power animal a pengiun? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list