From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-12245-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 32117 invoked from network); 3 May 2004 21:48:13 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39)
  by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 3 May 2004 21:48:13 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1BKlIL-0005lA-Ie
	for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 May 2004 21:48:13 +0000
Received: (qmail 14227 invoked by uid 50004); 3 May 2004 21:48:13 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 14211 invoked from network); 3 May 2004 21:48:13 +0000
X-T2-Posting-ID: u9rnRZgUmqp9JKZhS2u1flu8WzprZwi8JlbrGWWjocs=
From: Olivier =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cr=EAte?= <tester@gentoo.org>
To: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20040503222737.3c8f2867@snowdrop.home>
References: <200405011242.24252.lanius@gentoo.org>
	 <1083420653.4263.9.camel@y0shi> <1083618787.7241.18.camel@rivendell>
	 <20040503222737.3c8f2867@snowdrop.home>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UsYl3CRRMGCRKxlLPdfU"
Organization: Gentoo
Message-Id: <1083620885.28369.4.camel@TesterTop.tester.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 23:48:05 +0200
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of GLEP 16
X-Archives-Salt: 4f6cfa0b-03ca-4e79-927f-1f84bbc0948d
X-Archives-Hash: 11045aa1d8992940048ad208c5dca2ac

--=-UsYl3CRRMGCRKxlLPdfU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 23:27, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 03 May 2004 23:13:07 +0200 foser <foser@gentoo.org> wrote:
> | > Also of note, if upstream rejects your
> | > patch, you'll end up maintaining it for life, updating as often as
> | > upstream moves a few things in their own menu code.
> The Fluxbox people are basically saying they're only interested if it
> doesn't introduce another major dependency. One of the ideas behind the
> lightweight WMs is that they don't require everything-plus-kitchen-sink.

The people who want minimal window managers probably are not interested
in large auto-generated easy to use menus that include every apps
installed. If the upstream providers are not interested in having their
WM support the freedesktop standard so be it, they wont have nice menus.
Lets not become debian on that front.=20

--=20
Olivier Cr=EAte
tester@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer

--=-UsYl3CRRMGCRKxlLPdfU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAlr4VHTiOWk7ZorsRAnk8AJ9YBPgZ7QZn8gR6AE1AT4UXI21HgACdGYuP
F6FVaYW+B6CseA6SqLvTags=
=Bs6J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-UsYl3CRRMGCRKxlLPdfU--