public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Nilsson <john@milsson.nu>
To: "Olivier Crête" <tester@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] strange gentoo shutdown sequence
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 08:46:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1083566796.5401.54.camel@newkid.milsson.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1083564905.8372.3.camel@TesterTop.tester.ca>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 966 bytes --]

I remember a time when gentoo (enoch?) used djb's daemontools to manages
services. Why was this changed?

-John

On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 08:15, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 07:10, John Nilsson wrote:
> > While on the topic:
> > 	Is it resonable to patch gdm so that /etc/init.d/xdm is zapped after
> > gdm is killed by selecting reboot/shutdown from the login screen?
> > It just annoys me that the script errors while shutting down.
> 
> 
> This is imho a misfeature of the current initscripts system. The
> started-ness of an application is only checked against a file and not
> against the current real status. We should probably add a possible
> "status()" function to them (that would default to true) that would
> check if the service is still running in a custom way.. And zap it if it
> isnt... The problem there is with dependencies, should they be stopped
> if the service died? But the current system is clearly broken..

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-05-03  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-02 17:32 [gentoo-dev] strange gentoo shutdown sequence William Hubbs
2004-05-03  5:10 ` John Nilsson
2004-05-03  6:15   ` Olivier Crête
2004-05-03  6:46     ` John Nilsson [this message]
2004-05-03 17:22       ` Grant Goodyear
2004-05-03  8:30     ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-05-03  8:50       ` Allen D Parker
2004-05-03  9:05         ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-05-05 18:11           ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-05-03 16:24 ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 15:13   ` [gentoo-dev] " Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 15:33     ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 16:00       ` Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 16:30         ` Jon Portnoy
2004-05-04 15:16   ` Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 15:37     ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 15:59       ` Sven Köhler
2004-05-04 16:25         ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-07 16:33           ` Chris Gianelloni
2004-05-07 17:53             ` splite-gentoo
2004-05-04 16:28         ` Daniel Drake
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-02 11:40 [gentoo-dev] " Sven Köhler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1083566796.5401.54.camel@newkid.milsson.nu \
    --to=john@milsson.nu \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=tester@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox