From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-10426-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 25779 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2004 03:37:57 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39)
  by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Feb 2004 03:37:57 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Asw3Z-0004yy-3k
	for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 03:37:57 +0000
Received: (qmail 17887 invoked by uid 50004); 17 Feb 2004 03:37:56 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 10764 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2004 03:37:56 +0000
From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <1076987863.15233.27.camel@localhost>
References: <1076987863.15233.27.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-oYGFZEBJnkY2MgtPYLMx"
Message-Id: <1076989072.15355.1.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:37:52 -0500
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamxCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-38.7, required 5,
	EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, IN_REP_TO, PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_XIMIAN)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] No XFree86 w/ new license
X-Archives-Salt: 39e0d1af-0e85-4182-8caa-d0b659a8683f
X-Archives-Hash: 1c1a9842d006752af055e45d8d285c6f

--=-oYGFZEBJnkY2MgtPYLMx
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 22:17, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I won't elaborate on the reasons because it's been discussed quite
> thoroughly in other forums [2-8].

Addendum:
9. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dopenbsd-misc&m=3D107696705911864&w=3D2

--=-oYGFZEBJnkY2MgtPYLMx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAMYyQXVaO67S1rtsRAvR2AKCkUuY/VHjuiouAuSS2F84GuEGHmwCg+cjA
QOiEX05m7enyhFz5DPSC3DU=
=s/Lm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-oYGFZEBJnkY2MgtPYLMx--