Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme

[Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1123 bytes --]

On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 04:14, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:02:23AM -0500, in
> <20040127080223.GB5541@dev.gentoo.org>, Blake Matheny <jake@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> > Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis?
> > > I think dev-cl doesnt tell much, might be better to have something like
> > > dev-clisp.. and while we're at it.. dev-lisp...
> > Not what I was suggesting. As seemant said, I think a good direction to go
> > would be lisp-clisp, lisp-scheme, etc as the game categories have done.
> I know convention states that categories will be named <type>-<subtype>
> and, by the "games" precedent, split into <subtype>-<subsubtype> when
> necessary. Is there anything that actually stops us from using more than
> one dash in a category name? I can see that this opens a huge can-o-worms,
> but how about dev-lisp, dev-lisp-clisp, dev-lisp-scheme, etc.?

I am pretty sure that categories can only have one dash.  At least I
know that was true, but I am not positive if it still holds to be the
same.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Games Team

Is your power animal a penguin?

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]