From: Todd Berman <tberman@gentoo.org>
To: Spider <spider@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GTK2 QT Theme
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:32:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1073809945.1285.11.camel@proton> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040111085937.06f3d628.spider@gentoo.org>
On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 02:59, Spider wrote:
> begin quote
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:18:24 +1100
> Troy Dack <tad@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> >
>
>
> > Ebuild is at:
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~tad/overlay/x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt/
> > (copy to your overlay directory, don't forget the patch in files/)
> >
> > Screenshot at:
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~tad/gtk-qt.png (~560K, 1600x1200)
> >
> > Currently most gtk-engines-* ebuilds seem to belong to the Gnome herd,
> > so not wanting to step on anyones toes, would the Gnome herd object to
> > this build being placed in the tree?
>
> as it is its crashy, check the reported gaim crashes due to the theme
> for example (yes. that was the 0.2 version). as ~ is -not- a playground
> for broken packages or known buggy things I oppose the inclusion of this
> until it can be shown as to not crash applications.
>
>
>
> //Spider
While I completely agree with that normally, I do think that since there
is nothing else like this, and if TaD adds some sort of disclaimer at
the bottom suggesting that it is crashy and they should try changing
their theme and seeing if crashes persist it shouldn't be a problem.
If this was an important package it being a bit buggy would be a good
reason to not include it, but it is basically a novelty item, and if TaD
will maintain it, why not?
Gentoo is about choice, and if a user chooses to run buggy themes that
might cause an app or two to capsize, who are we to stop them?
--Todd
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-11 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-11 7:18 [gentoo-dev] GTK2 QT Theme Troy Dack
2004-01-11 7:57 ` Georgi Georgiev
2004-01-11 9:07 ` Troy Dack
2004-01-11 7:59 ` Spider
2004-01-11 8:32 ` Todd Berman [this message]
2004-01-11 9:58 ` Georgi Georgiev
2004-01-11 10:54 ` Troy Dack
2004-01-11 11:34 ` Drake Wyrm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1073809945.1285.11.camel@proton \
--to=tberman@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=spider@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox