* Re: [gentoo-dev] Integration Builds
@ 2004-01-05 21:42 pollockd
2004-01-06 12:16 ` Paul de Vrieze
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: pollockd @ 2004-01-05 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 747 bytes --]
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 17:59, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> If you want to integrate both a scheme like
> eclipse-sdk-3.0.0_pre6.20031218
This naming scheme does not work. It seems to complain about the extra
period. I've also been having problems with "_pre200312182000". It
seems to be too many digits, and generates a traceback.
"3.0_pre200312182000" would probably be fine (but it doesn't work
currently). Milestones are really integration builds with a special
stamp of approval anyway. The time is important, as multiple
integration builds can happen in one day.
> Some help in fixing minor issues is allways welcome though (the stupid splash
> screen)
What problems are you having with the splash screen?
Doug.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Integration Builds
2004-01-05 21:42 [gentoo-dev] Integration Builds pollockd
@ 2004-01-06 12:16 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-01-06 14:52 ` pollockd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul de Vrieze @ 2004-01-06 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 05 January 2004 22:42, pollockd@magma.ca wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 17:59, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > If you want to integrate both a scheme like
> > eclipse-sdk-3.0.0_pre6.20031218
>
> This naming scheme does not work. It seems to complain about the
> extra period. I've also been having problems with "_pre200312182000".
> It seems to be too many digits, and generates a traceback.
>
> "3.0_pre200312182000" would probably be fine (but it doesn't work
> currently). Milestones are really integration builds with a special
> stamp of approval anyway. The time is important, as multiple
> integration builds can happen in one day.
>
You could drop the 200 in front of the digit
> > Some help in fixing minor issues is allways welcome though (the
> > stupid splash screen)
>
> What problems are you having with the splash screen?
Sometimes with 2.1.2 the install splash screen shows up instead of the
eclipse splash screen. It doesn't change the functioning, but it doesn't
look nice. I've had no such problems yet with m5 and m6
Paul
- --
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/+qc2bKx5DBjWFdsRAlh0AJ4+e6ge38azLTOwmQwS9t+YS8pYoACfcfbI
eSLwFD/rWpoo05oMJtNlr3Q=
=QV/V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Integration Builds
2004-01-06 12:16 ` Paul de Vrieze
@ 2004-01-06 14:52 ` pollockd
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pollockd @ 2004-01-06 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1203 bytes --]
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 07:16, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> You could drop the 200 in front of the digit
I suppose I should have explicitly asked. Is this a limitation of the
size of the number? A limitation on the length of the string? What is
this limit, and where is it documented? (I probably missed it
somewhere....)
> Sometimes with 2.1.2 the install splash screen shows up instead of the
> eclipse splash screen. It doesn't change the functioning, but it doesn't
> look nice. I've had no such problems yet with m5 and m6
This is possibly "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=42415".
This particular bug is fixed in the 3.0 development stream. The
symptoms would be similar to what you describe, and would be caused by
the installation directory being read-only. Eclipse previously
attempted to write a small configuration directory to the installation
directory on first execution. In the absence of this configuration
directory, it re-runs the installation at start-up.
A workaround is to install Eclipse to a directory writable by the user,
or possibly to run Eclipse once as root when the file system is writable
(i.e., at install time).
Doug.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-06 14:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-05 21:42 [gentoo-dev] Integration Builds pollockd
2004-01-06 12:16 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-01-06 14:52 ` pollockd
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox