* [gentoo-dev] app-portage/dev-tools proposal
@ 2004-01-02 4:15 Ian Leitch
2004-01-02 4:22 ` Mike Frysinger
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ian Leitch @ 2004-01-02 4:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 548 bytes --]
Hi all,
I think a package for developer's tools may be a good idea. Currently
echangelog can be moved from gentoolkit, do any users use this?
My script in #36663 needs a point of release, plus I'm planning a few
more dev scripts. Shipping them along with gentoolkit seems a bit
wasteful for users who will never/can't (no CVS access etc) use them.
Comments?
--
Ian Leitch
Gentoo Linux Developer
GPG Public Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~port001/port001-pgp-key.asc
Fingerprint: 91AE 2E49 3DE6 B714 E0F0 D2E3 79F6 7879 6017 4462
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] app-portage/dev-tools proposal
2004-01-02 4:15 [gentoo-dev] app-portage/dev-tools proposal Ian Leitch
@ 2004-01-02 4:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-01-02 4:27 ` Ian Leitch
2004-01-02 5:35 ` Drake Wyrm
2004-01-03 15:29 ` Markus Nigbur
2004-01-03 20:18 ` Aron Griffis
2 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2004-01-02 4:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]
On Thursday 01 January 2004 23:15, Ian Leitch wrote:
> Comments?
why not 'gentoolkit-dev' ?
'dev-tools' seems a little too generic imho
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] app-portage/dev-tools proposal
2004-01-02 4:22 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2004-01-02 4:27 ` Ian Leitch
2004-01-02 5:35 ` Drake Wyrm
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ian Leitch @ 2004-01-02 4:27 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Mike Frysinger; +Cc: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 453 bytes --]
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 04:22, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 01 January 2004 23:15, Ian Leitch wrote:
> > Comments?
>
> why not 'gentoolkit-dev' ?
> 'dev-tools' seems a little too generic imho
> -mike
Thats fine, dev-tools was just the first to come to mind.
--
Ian Leitch
Gentoo Linux Developer
GPG Public Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~port001/port001-pgp-key.asc
Fingerprint: 91AE 2E49 3DE6 B714 E0F0 D2E3 79F6 7879 6017 4462
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] app-portage/dev-tools proposal
2004-01-02 4:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-01-02 4:27 ` Ian Leitch
@ 2004-01-02 5:35 ` Drake Wyrm
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Drake Wyrm @ 2004-01-02 5:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 11:22:25PM -0500, in <200401012322.35916.vapier@gentoo.org>, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 01 January 2004 23:15, Ian Leitch wrote:
> > Comments?
> why not 'gentoolkit-dev' ?
> 'dev-tools' seems a little too generic imho
or shorter: gendevkit
--
Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"?
Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action.
--Ghost in the Shell
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] app-portage/dev-tools proposal
2004-01-02 4:15 [gentoo-dev] app-portage/dev-tools proposal Ian Leitch
2004-01-02 4:22 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2004-01-03 15:29 ` Markus Nigbur
2004-01-03 16:10 ` Ian Leitch
2004-01-03 20:18 ` Aron Griffis
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Markus Nigbur @ 2004-01-03 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Ian Leitch; +Cc: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 707 bytes --]
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 05:15, Ian Leitch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think a package for developer's tools may be a good idea. Currently
> echangelog can be moved from gentoolkit, do any users use this?
> My script in #36663 needs a point of release, plus I'm planning a few
> more dev scripts. Shipping them along with gentoolkit seems a bit
> wasteful for users who will never/can't (no CVS access etc) use them.
>
> Comments?
Sounds nice. This would give my metadata script a neat home. :)
Should we move repoman in there too? It's after all a dev tool and
nothing every portage users needs.
-- Markus
--
(o_ Markus Nigbur
//\ Gentoo Linux Developer
[ ]/_ http://www.gentoo.org
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] app-portage/dev-tools proposal
2004-01-03 15:29 ` Markus Nigbur
@ 2004-01-03 16:10 ` Ian Leitch
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ian Leitch @ 2004-01-03 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: pYrania; +Cc: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 512 bytes --]
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 15:29, Markus Nigbur wrote:
> Sounds nice. This would give my metadata script a neat home. :)
> Should we move repoman in there too? It's after all a dev tool and
> nothing every portage users needs.
>
> -- Markus
I wondered about repoman, its not tied to specific portage versions in
any way is it?
--
Ian Leitch
Gentoo Linux Developer
GPG Public Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~port001/port001-pgp-key.asc
Fingerprint: 91AE 2E49 3DE6 B714 E0F0 D2E3 79F6 7879 6017 4462
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] app-portage/dev-tools proposal
2004-01-02 4:15 [gentoo-dev] app-portage/dev-tools proposal Ian Leitch
2004-01-02 4:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-01-03 15:29 ` Markus Nigbur
@ 2004-01-03 20:18 ` Aron Griffis
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Aron Griffis @ 2004-01-03 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 334 bytes --]
Ian Leitch wrote: [Thu Jan 01 2004, 11:15:16PM EST]
> Comments?
You should definitely talk with KarlTk about this since he has been
working on restructuring things within gentoolkit.
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer (alpha / ia64 / ruby / vim)
Key fingerprint = E3B6 8734 C2D6 B5E5 AE76 FB3A 26B1 C5E3 2010 4EB0
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-03 20:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-02 4:15 [gentoo-dev] app-portage/dev-tools proposal Ian Leitch
2004-01-02 4:22 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-01-02 4:27 ` Ian Leitch
2004-01-02 5:35 ` Drake Wyrm
2004-01-03 15:29 ` Markus Nigbur
2004-01-03 16:10 ` Ian Leitch
2004-01-03 20:18 ` Aron Griffis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox