From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18970 invoked by uid 1002); 22 Nov 2003 14:45:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 24395 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2003 14:45:20 -0000 From: Lisa Seelye To: Matthew Kennedy Cc: Gentoo Dev In-Reply-To: <87ptfk7uhu.fsf@killr.ath.cx> References: <200311191114.25081.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200311211050.59578.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> <8765hdu4zg.fsf@killr.ath.cx> <20031121183551.GE2221@gentoo.org> <87ptfk7uhu.fsf@killr.ath.cx> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-eutBJEjLPgUp4t370+1y" Message-Id: <1069512308.32640.91.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 09:45:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure X-Archives-Salt: 0eec7c75-49a8-4ff0-a532-cf08cc904cb8 X-Archives-Hash: 666f03e9f813544f66af540a4f621aae --=-eutBJEjLPgUp4t370+1y Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 02:06, Matthew Kennedy wrote: > I suppose I am dismayed that we are failing to promote free software > over proprietary software. That is neither our job or place. We give our users as many packages as we can and let them make the decision themselves. It would be a sad day indeed when a distribution based on user choice (such as ours) eliminated a whole class of software just to avoid making a relatively easy change to Portage. --=20 Regards, -Lisa --=-eutBJEjLPgUp4t370+1y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/v3Z0y0a1Vh5Jb8URAlltAJ9UlIZmjQ5SKi/Wx0v6ZbMsQcx4twCeNDNX FspYcLDy79bEfeHCOayxffI= =lY/9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-eutBJEjLPgUp4t370+1y--