From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7915 invoked by uid 1002); 21 Nov 2003 12:34:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 4556 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2003 12:34:23 -0000 From: William Kenworthy Reply-To: billk@iinet.net.au To: gentoo-dev List In-Reply-To: <1069412078.4883.15.camel@bengal.lan> References: <200311191114.25081.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200311211050.59578.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> <200311210226.hAL2QNe4093277@mxsf04.cluster1.charter.net> <20031121031332.GB22586@time> <20031121100737.GJ1502@gentoo.org> <32878.141.166.236.158.1069410832.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> <1069412078.4883.15.camel@bengal.lan> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1069418053.9189.5.camel@rattus.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 20:34:13 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure X-Archives-Salt: 33742e33-3e57-4230-99cb-2c9787f14779 X-Archives-Hash: e55a04cd74f793eed84405af167b3e30 as a user I'd object to that. I think that accept all is the best default as that would seem to be the most useful and popular path. Otherwise, you may as well install debian if you are going to force restrictions on people out of the box. Keep in mind that gentoo is about choice, and not forcing people to go down a minority path, but also to allow people to choose that path if they want to. On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 18:54, Erik Swanson wrote: > As a user, I'd prefer if only OSI-approved licenses were accepted by > default. This also seems like it'd be most in keeping with the Gentoo > Social Contract. -- William Kenworthy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list