From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25672 invoked by uid 1002); 21 Nov 2003 10:54:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19316 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2003 10:54:48 -0000 From: Erik Swanson To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <32878.141.166.236.158.1069410832.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> References: <200311191114.25081.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200311211050.59578.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> <200311210226.hAL2QNe4093277@mxsf04.cluster1.charter.net> <20031121031332.GB22586@time> <20031121100737.GJ1502@gentoo.org> <32878.141.166.236.158.1069410832.squirrel@spidermail.richmond.edu> Message-Id: <1069412078.4883.15.camel@bengal.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 02:54:39 -0800 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo internal structure X-Archives-Salt: 62e2536d-9851-42cd-bbb3-133356cdccc2 X-Archives-Hash: 50f466da9d595c86188f870fcb369af7 On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 02:33, donnie berkholz wrote: > I think we should accept all the licenses by default except the ones for > which the ACCEPT_LICENSE variable originally existed (the id games ones), > since users must be forced to read and agree to those. This would keep the > change seamless for the user unless said user wishes to change things. As a user, I'd prefer if only OSI-approved licenses were accepted by default. This also seems like it'd be most in keeping with the Gentoo Social Contract. -- Erik Swanson -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list