From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org>
To: Gentoo-Dev List <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] *-config tool renaming?
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:15:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1069175740.8188.39.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031118161047.GA30056@unm.edu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 633 bytes --]
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 11:10, Jason Mobarak wrote:
> Yeah... with this rational the g- naming scheme sounds like a good idea. I've
> been in several situations where I'm definitely not wanting to try and remember
> which tool could save my butt, it'd be nice to type g-<tab> and get a listing of
> all the Gentoo specific tools offered. Perhaps combined with update-* and
> config-* this could be really useful.
>
> -- Jason Mobarak
That was my goal in suggesting that the update-* tools be renamed
config-*. Because it's merely semantics in calling it an update or a
configuration, they're both really about the same.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-18 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-16 9:24 [gentoo-dev] *-config tool renaming? Donnie Berkholz
2003-11-16 10:13 ` Robin H. Johnson
2003-11-16 11:00 ` Markus Nigbur
2003-11-17 14:45 ` Luca Barbato
2003-11-17 23:18 ` William Kenworthy
2003-11-17 23:22 ` Ricardo Loureiro
2003-11-18 0:11 ` Markus Nigbur
2003-11-18 0:26 ` Peter Ruskin
2003-11-18 1:13 ` Jason Mobarak
2003-11-18 1:31 ` Bill Kenworthy
2003-11-18 2:12 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-11-18 16:10 ` Jason Mobarak
2003-11-18 17:15 ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2003-11-18 17:49 ` Karl Trygve Kalleberg
2003-11-19 0:24 ` William Kenworthy
2003-11-19 3:38 ` Aron Griffis
2003-11-16 16:08 ` Brian Jackson
2003-11-16 18:04 ` George Shapovalov
2003-11-17 3:11 ` Jason Rhinelander
2003-11-17 4:18 ` donnie berkholz
2003-11-17 14:17 ` Gregorio Guidi
2003-11-17 15:09 ` Markus Nigbur
2003-11-17 15:32 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-11-17 21:17 ` Markus Nigbur
2003-11-17 18:24 ` Donnie Berkholz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1069175740.8188.39.camel@localhost \
--to=spyderous@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox