public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cowie <andrew@operationaldynamics.com>
To: suka <suka@t0.or.at>, Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Binary ebuild for openoffice-ximian
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:55:42 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1068969342.24232.56.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1068800516.6078.63.camel@zaurus.linux.net>

On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 20:01, suka wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 09:47, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > That is a from-source ebuild. I have no idea where and if binary builds 
> > are offered...
> 
> As I have been providing the openoffice-ximian ebuilds to the forums
> quite some time before they went into portage, I think I can say there
> is quite some interest. But I agree it could be difficult... 

I've been using Suka's ebuild of openoffice-ximian for a while now;
there were some warts (I think in OO, not OO-x) in the release
candidates, but openoffice-ximian-1.1.0 is AWESOME.

On my system the binary .tbz2 came in at 73.5 MB - not the kind of thing
that can be casually made available on anything other than a high
bandwidth mirror. I agree with Paul that given the nightmare dependency
graph behind this thing, providing binaries is a limited-value
proposition because of the likelihood of a dependency mismatch - but
nevertheless, if we can find a way to help people with slower machines,
all to the good.

WARNING!

For anyone considering trying building this thing, they really aren't
kidding when they say it needs > 4.5 GigaBytes 
to build and 12-14 hours to build and packages. It's a real bummer to
run out of space somewhere around the install/buildpackage/merge step.
This is an excellent time to use

 	PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/partition/with/lots/of/space/tmp"

on the command line before emerge...

Also, if you're not using the buildpkg feature by default, then do
yourself a favour and use the -b argument to emerge so that if you need
to re-emerge it later "to fix some little thing" you don't have to sit
through that build again.

Thanks again to suka... 

AfC
Sydney

P.S. Paul, is what's in portage now based on Suka's work? If not, what,
if any, significant differences are there about the ebuild?


-- 
Andrew Frederick Cowie
Operational Dynamics Consulting Pty Ltd

Australia: +61 2 9977 6866

http://www.operationaldynamics.com/

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-16  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-13  6:23 [gentoo-dev] Binary ebuild for openoffice-ximian Sebastian Bergmann
2003-11-13  7:29 ` Troy Dack
2003-11-13 12:54   ` [gentoo-dev] " Sebastian Bergmann
2003-11-14  4:44     ` Troy Dack
2003-11-14  8:47       ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-11-14  9:01         ` suka
2003-11-16  7:55           ` Andrew Cowie [this message]
2003-11-16  9:31             ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-11-16 21:20             ` Steven Elling
2003-11-17 10:45               ` Paul de Vrieze

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1068969342.24232.56.camel@localhost \
    --to=andrew@operationaldynamics.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=pauldv@gentoo.org \
    --cc=suka@t0.or.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox