From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1657 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Nov 2003 00:53:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 32048 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2003 00:53:54 -0000 From: Benjamin Coles To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200311120955.12122.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <1068645080.32406.6.camel@gentoo.pendulus.net> <200311120955.12122.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mwMb1DGiRv6TIhJXYTbX" Message-Id: <1068684812.23207.24.camel@gentoo.pendulus.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:53:33 -0800 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla upgrade X-Archives-Salt: 301a874f-d2ab-43fa-b084-799751edd00a X-Archives-Hash: 2e0e2dcd76209cd089b5d169f95633c1 --=-mwMb1DGiRv6TIhJXYTbX Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Okay it took me a minute to figure out the "quicksearch" at the main page at bugs.gentoo.org. It was a javascript error for the newer browsers but it's now fixed Bug 33283. Lisa's issue about bug_status.html was going through an update as well to make changes to reflect our current settings, they were the standard bugzilla before and no one ever took the time to edit it. Mr_Bones, first issue taken care of one more to go! Vapier's issue revolving around the NOTOURBUG vs UPSTREAM... I chose the familar resolution I've seen at other sites, there was a bug revolving around it on bugs.gentoo.org which I closed last night due to the upgrade, might have been better to have mentioned it in there before I upgraded. Now we'll have to wait until next upgrade and vote for it then. Mholzer can you confirm this bug yours because I got bug #33283 just fine, it could have been when I was trying to fix the bug that mail wasn't sent. The reason it wasn't able to send mail before was because of the templates that we had in place where corrupted but I managed to fix them all before this upgrade. ------------- Thanks, Benjamin Coles Gentoo Infrastructure On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 06:54, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 12 November 2003 08:51, Benjamin Coles wrote: > > I also added a > > new resolution status "NOTOURBUG" to make things more organized instead > > of "WONTFIX" which has other characteristics. >=20 > wouldnt it be better to use 'UPSTREAM' ? > not our bug seems to convey the wrong connotation ... > -mike --=-mwMb1DGiRv6TIhJXYTbX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/stYMsjUdhzS2HqERAmwAAKDeA/YeGzjTlbY/qAkDJg3BgZ6TjwCdFeoJ 96QCMnA8F1MQgLzCNDG6Tbg= =bIvm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mwMb1DGiRv6TIhJXYTbX--