On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 13:47, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> umm ACCEPT_LICENSE has been pointed out in other threads (specifically the one 
> where the id/EULA violation was originally discussed) and can be found in a 
> semi-old bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17367
> if you mean to say that the variable actually does something, then you'd be 
> wrong ... there is no code behind that variable atm ...
> -mike

I have ACCEPT_LICENSE="SAVAGE" in make.conf, and emerge savagedemo does
not show a license or force me to agree to anything. Thus I would say
the lack of interactivity is preserved and there is indeed code behind
it, unless some other force I'm unaware of is at work.