From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4065 invoked by uid 1002); 29 Oct 2003 17:33:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 30819 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2003 17:33:01 -0000 From: Martin Schlemmer Reply-To: azarah@gentoo.org To: Philippe Coulonges Cc: Gentoo-Dev In-Reply-To: <20031028145858.5c7ecc4d.cphil@cphil.net> References: <20031028145858.5c7ecc4d.cphil@cphil.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-blrsmVLBATnd2EfFjCGV" Message-Id: <1067448829.9405.33.camel@nosferatu.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:33:49 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ppc cross-compiler X-Archives-Salt: ddb7e5d9-013a-4f9c-b06c-8b1592a86216 X-Archives-Hash: 75928e759151c732a1c9ea085a59a420 --=-blrsmVLBATnd2EfFjCGV Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 15:58, Philippe Coulonges wrote: > Something puzzles me. >=20 > The gcc ebuild seems ready to handle installation of a cross-compiler, > but the binutils ebuild don't. >=20 > Is there a purpose ?=20 > Is it a work in progress ?=20 > Did I miss something ? >=20 Yes, we are waiting for multi-SLOT per version support portage side. Else I guess you could cp the binutils ebuild to binutils-cross or something, and mod it a bit, or use one of the few in bugzilla ... --=20 Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa --=-blrsmVLBATnd2EfFjCGV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/n/n9qburzKaJYLYRAuYlAJ9XKz1Lo81uZ0QOAk0KULxZ1IDu6QCfcjqN nXv4noSxdTkAZCaLqiRUc/4= =NF/N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-blrsmVLBATnd2EfFjCGV--