From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16290 invoked by uid 1002); 27 Oct 2003 21:26:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 29339 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2003 21:26:38 -0000 From: Martin Schlemmer Reply-To: azarah@gentoo.org To: Paul de Vrieze Cc: Gentoo-Dev In-Reply-To: <200310272030.51885.pauldv@gentoo.org> References: <20031027042839.GC28917@digitasaru.net> <200310271013.53678.gentoo@pandora.be> <1067277766.9405.13.camel@nosferatu.lan> <200310272030.51885.pauldv@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-di82qFBDYDxCpz2MArwY" Message-Id: <1067290041.9405.21.camel@nosferatu.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:27:22 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] NPTL ready yet? X-Archives-Salt: 8e16b3b6-403d-4dab-9528-219b94aff035 X-Archives-Hash: 7b95c6418d24369fc1aa16197f1659ab --=-di82qFBDYDxCpz2MArwY Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 21:30, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Monday 27 October 2003 19:02, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 11:13, Christophe Vanfleteren wrote: > > > On Monday 27 October 2003 05:46, Adam Porich wrote: > > > > I have been using it for 3 or 4 weeks, with nvidia drivers and > > > > mm-sources, no problems at all. > > > > > > Have you been able to get java working? > > > Last time I compiled glibc with NPTL, javac crashed constantly (with > > > both sun and blackdown jdks). > > > > I had this issue as well, but it was pretty much an odd problem that > > surfaced on any gcc3 system back then (except if we are talking > > different issue, but then I have been using NPTL for close a year now, > > and cant remember issues like that), and not NPTL specific. > > >=20 > To that respect, is there a good 2.4 NPTL kernel that you can recommend? >=20 You will have to look toward getting a Redhat kernel into the tree, or possibly try to rip the critical patches out of one ... Cheers, --=20 Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa --=-di82qFBDYDxCpz2MArwY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQA/nY25qburzKaJYLYRAt6IAJipM+HhyjF7KGYrpZKAC1MaG1MjAJ9Apl5i Hm8ASpcuo0aSIY6XqB34pw== =T+F3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-di82qFBDYDxCpz2MArwY--