From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-1623-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 22164 invoked by uid 1002); 24 Feb 2003 23:56:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 25025 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2003 23:56:54 -0000
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:44:23 -0800
From: Matt Tucker <tuck@whistlingfish.net>
To: Brandon Low <lostlogic@gentoo.org>
cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Message-ID: <106700000.1046130263@benzene.cobaltgroup.com>
In-Reply-To: <101620000.1046129911@benzene.cobaltgroup.com>
References: <20030224210337.GA32763@lostlogicx.com>
 <1046122741.4339.10.camel@malfus>
 <20030224223942.GC32763@lostlogicx.com>
 <101620000.1046129911@benzene.cobaltgroup.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.1 (Linux/x86)
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] db-3.2.9-r2
X-Archives-Salt: 6f47fd32-16db-4b88-8750-76cfe68c5dac
X-Archives-Hash: 8a247e36e174d173b826224daef95fc5

-- Matt Tucker <tuck@whistlingfish.net> spake thusly:

> Your compile command for db_dump185 is:
> 
>     gcc -c -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../dist/../include -D_REENTRANT 
>      ../dist/../db_dump185/db_dump185.c
> 
> whereas on my system it's using:
> 
>     gcc -I/usr/include/db1  -c -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../dist/../include
>     -D_REENTRANT  ../dist/../db_dump185/db_dump185.c
> 
> This stuff is hard-coded in dist/Makefile.in:
> 
>     DB185INC= -I/usr/include/db1	-c @CFLAGS@
>               -I$(srcdir)/include     @CPPFLAGS@
>     DB185LIB= -ldb1
>     .
>     .
>     .
>     db_dump185@o@: $(srcdir)/db_dump185/db_dump185.c
>     	$(CC) $(DB185INC) $?
> 
> However, it's _NOT_ in Makefile.in.orig, so I assume there's a gentoo
> patch that you're not picking up. 'emerge sync' perhaps?

A followup on this. In db-3.2.9-r2.ebuild, I see:

	# We should get dump185 to link against system db1 ..
	# <azarah@gentoo.org> (23 Feb 2003)
	cp ${S}/dist/Makefile.in ${S}/dist/Makefile.in.orig
	sed -e 's:DB185INC=:DB185INC= -I/usr/include/db1:' \
		-e 's:DB185LIB=:DB185LIB= -ldb1:' \
		${S}/dist/Makefile.in.orig > ${S}/dist/Makefile.in

I'm going to bet that this isn't in your version -- particularly
because the change was apparently made yesterday.


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list