[gentoo-dev] test

[gentoo-dev] test

[Benjamin Coles]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 12 bytes --]

test email

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] test

[Thibaut Fernagut]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

please ignore
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF5zr/R6N46HXxiJERAuxMAKC8mIzInQr5FxEsUpFOXUpUAsl7MACg1rCD
RHlpGDlfMBicuIsvzPokXEY=
=wUsp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[expose]

> please ignore

if you wanted to test wether you successfully registered you could also have 
waited 12 hours, that is, you could have waited for as long as you would 
expect it to take unitl the next mail is sent to this list, which is unlikely 
to be longer than 12hrs.

cheers,

daniel
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Test

[Luis Francisco Araujo]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Test .. ignore

- --

Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org"
Gentoo Linux

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFSSYTaTNpke9pJcURAgjUAJ4vqegitzaO6Kk5b9Zwm53WwTcm6ACfX/fz
EoLOlEtCHk0RkUSEaG5lfIY=
=aw+F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] test

[Benjamin Allen]

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Paul de Vrieze]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

On Tuesday 04 October 2005 19:06, Benjamin Allen wrote:

what?

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] test

[Christian Birchinger]

Yes, such tests suck but i don't know how else to test it.

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Daniel Armyr]

I seem to vaguely remember that the program that manages these lists has some functions with which you can check if you are on the list or not...

--Daniel Armyr

On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 18:44:09 +0200 Christian Birchinger <joker@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Yes, such tests suck but i don't know how else to test it.
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
> 


-- 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
daniel.armyr@home.se	f00-dar@f.kth.se
Tegnergatan 40 rum 505	+46 8 8 31 52 17	
113 59 Stockholm	
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] test

[Matthew Kennedy]

-- 
Matthew Kennedy
Gentoo Linux Developer

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh]

I propose to immediately kick people from dev as soon as they send
message like this.

Matthew Kennedy wrote:

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Gustavo Adolfo Silva Ribeiro Felisberto]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 558 bytes --]

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 13:00:51 -0700
"Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" <iluxa@gentoo.org> wrote:

> I propose to immediately kick people from dev as soon as they send
> message like this.
> 
> Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
I agree. And i also propose that people that reply get kick/banned :)

-- 
Gustavo Felisberto
(HumpBack)
Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~humpback
Blog: http://blog.felisberto.net/
------------
It's most certainly GNU/Linux, not Linux. Read more at
http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html .
-------------

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Paul de Vrieze]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 05 June 2004 13:52, Gustavo Adolfo Silva Ribeiro Felisberto 
wrote:
> I agree. And i also propose that people that reply get kick/banned :)

Infra people might be excepted, but even they should write in the test 
message why it needs to be sent. "I don't seem to get messages" is 
certainly not a justification.

Paul

- -- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAxDiobKx5DBjWFdsRAhZfAJ9/xOYJ36N3aekSAYiXSqi5uZ2sGACeJVyo
EmZtDEBVSq+KSD71Vh2ywaQ=
=See1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Sven Vermeulen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 625 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:42:55AM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> Infra people might be excepted, but even they should write in the test 
> message why it needs to be sent. "I don't seem to get messages" is 
> certainly not a justification.

What about "testing procmail recipe" ? :)

/me ducks 

-- 
 Bent Hindrup Andersen, Danish MEP, about the Software Patent Directive:
    The approach of the Commission and Council in this directive is shocking. 
    They are making full use of all the possibilities of evading democracy that 
    the current Community Law provides.     <http://lwn.net/Articles/84009/>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Paul de Vrieze]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 07 June 2004 13:54, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:42:55AM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > Infra people might be excepted, but even they should write in the
> > test message why it needs to be sent. "I don't seem to get messages"
> > is certainly not a justification.
>
> What about "testing procmail recipe" ? :)
>
> /me ducks

/me just threw a big pie in a southward direction :)

Paul

- -- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAxFj4bKx5DBjWFdsRAnegAKC9t3vFcdSqeyNFDZGEKB0kFjSw7wCfdDMj
3xFrKwYZiDs+YDmj0POchWM=
=dDdm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Kurt Lieber]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 455 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:42:55AM +0200 or thereabouts, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> Infra people might be excepted, but even they should write in the test 
> message why it needs to be sent. "I don't seem to get messages" is 
> certainly not a justification.

For the record, I think the infra team sends *far* too many test messages
as it is.  I'd like to see us dramatically reduce (by 75 - 90%) the number
of test messages that we send.

--kurt

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] test

[leandro]

test

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] test

[Matthew Kennedy]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 68 bytes --]

empty message this time?
-- 
Matthew Kennedy
Gentoo Linux Developer

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Robin H. Johnson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 390 bytes --]

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:49:03PM -0600, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> empty message this time?
> -- 
> Matthew Kennedy
> Gentoo Linux Developer
Nope :-)



-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail     : robbat2@orbis-terrarum.net
Home Page  : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
ICQ#       : 30269588 or 41961639
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Jon Portnoy]

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:49:03PM -0600, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> empty message this time?
> -- 
> Matthew Kennedy
> Gentoo Linux Developer

No. 8)

-- 
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] test

[Benjamin Coles]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 39 bytes --]

this is a test, sorry about this guys

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] test

[Alberto Romero]

this is just a test, sorry!


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] TEST

[Brad Cowan]

this is a test of the emergency broadcast system NOTE: this is only a
test

-- 
Brad Cowan <bcowan@gentoo.org>
Developer,
Gentoo Linux	http://www.gentoo.org/~bcowan

Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB1F16A56
Key fingerprint = C408 75B9 E68D 26E2 EAAE  20CF 4D5E 293D B1F1 6A56

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] test

[John P.Davis]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 115 bytes --]

test

-- 
John P. Davis
Gentoo Linux Documentation Developer
http://www.gentoo.org
#gentoo-doc on irc.freenode.net

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Joachim Blaabjerg]

On Tuesday 10 December 2002 17:24, John P.Davis wrote:
> test

Ditto.

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Joachim Blaabjerg]

On Tuesday 10 December 2002 17:24, John P.Davis wrote:
> test

Ditto.

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] test

[Evan Read]

Forgive this!

[gentoo-dev] test

[Kevyn Shortell]

test

please ignore

[gentoo-dev] test

[Thomas M. Beaudry]

test

[gentoo-dev] test

[Tim van den Elsen]

sorry, please don't reply

[gentoo-dev] Test

[Teddai]

Re: [gentoo-dev] XFS / gentoo-sources

[Joachim Blaabjerg]

On Thursday 02 May 2002 12:35, Joachim Blaabjerg wrote:
> FWIW, I'm going to sit down and take another look at these patches right
> now, so wish me luck :P

I've merged the -gentoo patch with the XFS patches, and I think it works. I've 
left out kbuild-2.5 and KDB support, but I might add it later if it's badly 
wanted. I haven't got any XFS partitions, so I haven't been able to test 
whether it really works or not, but at least it compiles and boots.

Have anyone got the guts and partitions to test if this patch works?

Anyway, here it is (the regular -gentoo patch, _with_ XFS support):
http://www.SuxOS.org/~styx/gentoo/linux-gentoo-2.4.19-r2.patch.bz2

There's also a patch you can apply after the regular 
linux-gentoo-2.4.19-r1.patch:
http://www.SuxOS.org/~styx/gentoo/linux-gentoo-2.4.19-r1-r2.patch.bz2

I'm also going to add it as an entry in Bugzilla (with a request for thorough 
testing, the kernel patch, and a patch to the gentoo-sources ebuild).

Best Regards,

P.S! The patches haven't been uploaded yet, they'll probably be in place in 
about half an hour.

-- 
Joachim Blaabjerg
styx@SuxOS.org
www.SuxOS.org

[gentoo-dev] test

[dams]

Sorry, this is a test :/

[gentoo-dev] test

[John Dee]

test, ignore this.

[gentoo-dev] test

[Jared H. Hudson]

[gentoo-dev] test

[root]

[gentoo-dev] test

[Claes Nästen]

Hi!
I tried to merge wine-20011004 today but with no luck, after a while it said:

make[1]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/wine-20011004/work/wine-20011004/library'
gcc -c -I. -I. -I../include -I../include  -mcpu=i686 -march=i686 -O3 -pipe -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fPIC -D__WINE__ -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/X11R6/include -o debug.o debug.c
debug.c:23: redefinition of `struct option'
make[1]: *** [debug.o] Error 1

Just wanted to let you know about it, I'm not to eager about getting it work but the ebuild _should_ work.

/Claes Nästen

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Chad Huneycutt]

Claes Nästen wrote:

 > Hi! I tried to merge wine-20011004 today but with no luck, after a
 > while it said:
 >
 > make[1]: Entering directory
 > `/var/tmp/portage/wine-20011004/work/wine-20011004/library' gcc -c
 > -I. -I. -I../include -I../include  -mcpu=i686 -march=i686 -O3 -pipe
 >  -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fPIC -D__WINE__ -D_REENTRANT
 > -I/usr/X11R6/include -o debug.o debug.c debug.c:23: redefinition of
 >  `struct option' make[1]: *** [debug.o] Error 1
 >
 > Just wanted to let you know about it, I'm not to eager about getting
 >  it work but the ebuild _should_ work.


I saw this same problem with another ebuild.  I think some new headers 
must be declaring an 'option' structure that wasn't there before.  If no 
one else gets to it, I will throw together a patch, but all you have to 
do is rename all occurrences of "option' in debug.c to something like 
'xxx_option'.  Hopefully, it is a local data structure, and there aren't 
that many occurrences.



-- 
Chad Huneycutt
Ph.D. Student
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~chadh

Re: [gentoo-dev] test

[Karl Trygve Kalleberg]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 10:33:52 -0400
Chad Huneycutt <chad.huneycutt@acm.org> wrote:

> Claes Nästen wrote:
> 
>  > Hi! I tried to merge wine-20011004 today but with no luck, after a
>  > while it said:
>  >
>  > make[1]: Entering directory
>  > `/var/tmp/portage/wine-20011004/work/wine-20011004/library' gcc -c
>  > -I. -I. -I../include -I../include  -mcpu=i686 -march=i686 -O3 -pipe
>  >  -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fPIC -D__WINE__ -D_REENTRANT
>  > -I/usr/X11R6/include -o debug.o debug.c debug.c:23: redefinition of
>  >  `struct option' make[1]: *** [debug.o] Error 1
>  >
>  > Just wanted to let you know about it, I'm not to eager about getting
>  >  it work but the ebuild _should_ work.
> 
> 
> I saw this same problem with another ebuild.  I think some new headers 
> must be declaring an 'option' structure that wasn't there before.  If no

> one else gets to it, I will throw together a patch, but all you have to 
> do is rename all occurrences of "option' in debug.c to something like 
> 'xxx_option'.  Hopefully, it is a local data structure, and there aren't

> that many occurrences.

This is a nasty bug I've had with other packages. The last time was (I
think) when I upgraded galeon. I advise you to check if there are two
instances (ie, two different versions) of any packages. If so, ask
yourselves if you really need both.

Sorry that I do not have a better answer.


Kind regards,

Karl T

[gentoo-dev] test

[drobbins]

test, please ignore

-- 
Daniel Robbins					<drobbins@gentoo.org>
President/CEO					http://www.gentoo.org 
Gentoo Technologies, Inc.