* [gentoo-dev] xfce4-session ebuild problem
@ 2003-10-17 2:20 Brett I. Holcomb
2003-10-17 6:04 ` Daniel Robbins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brett I. Holcomb @ 2003-10-17 2:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
I'm running xfce4 on an AMD Athlon. I decided to merge xfce4-session today.
However, even with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS set to ~x86 it tells me there are no
unmasked packages. I checked /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask and did not
find it there. I then checked the ebuild and it has KEYWORDS="-* AMD64"!
What is with this? As far as I know xfce4-session is for x86s. Why does it
have AMD64 in the keywords and disallow all others?
Thanks.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] xfce4-session ebuild problem
2003-10-17 2:20 [gentoo-dev] xfce4-session ebuild problem Brett I. Holcomb
@ 2003-10-17 6:04 ` Daniel Robbins
2003-10-17 21:19 ` Brian Friday
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Robbins @ 2003-10-17 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Brett I.Holcomb; +Cc: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 783 bytes --]
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 20:20, Brett I.Holcomb wrote:
> I'm running xfce4 on an AMD Athlon. I decided to merge xfce4-session today.
> However, even with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS set to ~x86 it tells me there are no
> unmasked packages. I checked /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask and did not
> find it there. I then checked the ebuild and it has KEYWORDS="-* AMD64"!
>
> What is with this? As far as I know xfce4-session is for x86s. Why does it
> have AMD64 in the keywords and disallow all others?
I unmasked it on amd64, but it was masked on everything before.
According to the ChangeLog, apparently it conflicted with the xfce4
beta. Not sure if it should be unmasked or if I should re-mask on amd64,
so cc'ing bcowan on this for more info.
Regards,
Daniel
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] xfce4-session ebuild problem
2003-10-17 6:04 ` Daniel Robbins
@ 2003-10-17 21:19 ` Brian Friday
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brian Friday @ 2003-10-17 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Daniel Robbins; +Cc: Brett I.Holcomb, gentoo-dev
Hi all,
I'd vote to unmask it, as I and a colleague here at work
have had it running since September 30ish using the official
release of 4 without a problem. Without knowing more about
the RC breakage I can't be sure it won't break for others
but in daily use I've not had problems (bugs doesn't return
any submission relating to xfce4-session).
my lurking 2cents
- Brian
Daniel Robbins wrote:
>
> I unmasked it on amd64, but it was masked on everything before.
> According to the ChangeLog, apparently it conflicted with the xfce4
> beta. Not sure if it should be unmasked or if I should re-mask on amd64,
> so cc'ing bcowan on this for more info.
>
> Regards,
>
> Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-17 21:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-17 2:20 [gentoo-dev] xfce4-session ebuild problem Brett I. Holcomb
2003-10-17 6:04 ` Daniel Robbins
2003-10-17 21:19 ` Brian Friday
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox