* [gentoo-dev] The SIMD debacle
@ 2003-09-30 12:46 Jon Ellis
2003-09-30 12:57 ` Paul de Vrieze
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jon Ellis @ 2003-09-30 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Can someone explain the sse / 3dnow! situation to me?
My understanding is that most modern intel and amd chips supprt sse,
but only amd support 3dnow! Is this correct? Why would someone with a
pentium 4 box have 3dnow in their use flags?
Does anyone point me a ebuilds that correctly handle this stuff? It
would be most useful to understand how protect users from themselves
and reduce the number 'invalid instruction' bugs filed against
libvorbis!
Thanks
j.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The SIMD debacle
2003-09-30 12:46 [gentoo-dev] The SIMD debacle Jon Ellis
@ 2003-09-30 12:57 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-09-30 14:37 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-09-30 16:21 ` Chris Gianelloni
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul de Vrieze @ 2003-09-30 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 14:46, Jon Ellis wrote:
> Can someone explain the sse / 3dnow! situation to me?
>
> My understanding is that most modern intel and amd chips supprt sse,
> but only amd support 3dnow! Is this correct? Why would someone with a
> pentium 4 box have 3dnow in their use flags?
>
I think you are completely right, 3dnow in the useflags should be only done on
amd systems that have 3dnow.
> Does anyone point me a ebuilds that correctly handle this stuff? It
> would be most useful to understand how protect users from themselves
> and reduce the number 'invalid instruction' bugs filed against
> libvorbis!
I think you might want to put in a check to test for actual 3dnow support.
However it is perfectly legal to build a package on a p4 that is going to run
on an athlon, so disabling the useflag might limit the users.
Paul
- --
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/eX2mbKx5DBjWFdsRAlriAKCNN/lgHcVFYdZaceVvD5Kt0sgWAgCgiqgi
0zGRSJKQOS0stKTWREmM5II=
=Hv0F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The SIMD debacle
2003-09-30 12:46 [gentoo-dev] The SIMD debacle Jon Ellis
2003-09-30 12:57 ` Paul de Vrieze
@ 2003-09-30 14:37 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-09-30 16:21 ` Chris Gianelloni
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jon Portnoy @ 2003-09-30 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Jon Ellis; +Cc: gentoo-dev
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:46:49PM +0900, Jon Ellis wrote:
> Can someone explain the sse / 3dnow! situation to me?
>
> My understanding is that most modern intel and amd chips supprt sse,
> but only amd support 3dnow! Is this correct? Why would someone with a
> pentium 4 box have 3dnow in their use flags?
>
They shouldn't. It was, however, in make.defaults at one point - I have
no idea why.
I removed it a while back.
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The SIMD debacle
2003-09-30 12:46 [gentoo-dev] The SIMD debacle Jon Ellis
2003-09-30 12:57 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-09-30 14:37 ` Jon Portnoy
@ 2003-09-30 16:21 ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-09-30 19:35 ` David Holm
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Gianelloni @ 2003-09-30 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Jon Ellis; +Cc: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 939 bytes --]
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 08:46, Jon Ellis wrote:
> Can someone explain the sse / 3dnow! situation to me?
>
> My understanding is that most modern intel and amd chips supprt sse,
> but only amd support 3dnow! Is this correct? Why would someone with a
> pentium 4 box have 3dnow in their use flags?
Pentium 3 - sse
Pentium 4 - sse/sse2
Athlon - 3dnow
AthlonXP - 3dnow/sse
> Does anyone point me a ebuilds that correctly handle this stuff? It
> would be most useful to understand how protect users from themselves
> and reduce the number 'invalid instruction' bugs filed against
> libvorbis!
If you need some help with this ebuild, I'll gladly help, since I think
I might have been the one that caused you all the headache in the first
place.
>
> Thanks
>
> j.
>
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
--
Chris Gianelloni
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Games Team
Is your power animal a pengiun?
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-30 19:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-30 12:46 [gentoo-dev] The SIMD debacle Jon Ellis
2003-09-30 12:57 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-09-30 14:37 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-09-30 16:21 ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-09-30 19:35 ` David Holm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox