From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4484 invoked by uid 1002); 24 Sep 2003 00:21:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 29568 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2003 00:21:25 -0000 From: William Kenworthy Reply-To: billk@iinet.net.au To: Luke-Jr Cc: gentoo-dev List In-Reply-To: <200309232312.05766.luke-jr@gentoo.org> References: <20030922063300.8839A40AD@latitude.mynet.no-ip.org> <200309231558.17080.caleb@gentoo.org> <200309232312.05766.luke-jr@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064362874.10322.90.camel@rattus.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 24 Sep 2003 08:21:14 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo vs. the FHS X-Archives-Salt: a23ce41e-1e24-465a-be29-5a15256e4e8b X-Archives-Hash: e22ce43f35b6ec6c3a6142e8d1b1ad6c As someone who works with a number of different OS's daily, from solaris to various flavours of linux - the FHS and standards compliance is a godsend. The FHS has a few warts, and slavish compliance with it is not desired, but generally, it is a "good thing". Just because commercial apps use it, doesnt mean its bad for everyone else, they just benefit too. BillK On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 07:11, Luke-Jr wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tuesday 23 September 2003 10:12 pm, dams@idm.fr wrote: > > FHS is made so that f*cking proprietary application get well installed on -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list