[gentoo-dev] Status of gcc-3.2.3-r2[Scanned]

[gentoo-dev] Status of gcc-3.2.3-r2[Scanned]

[John Davis]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all:
Does anyone know the masking status of gcc-3.2.3-r2? It has been ~* for
quite some time. I know that it works fine on both my x86 and ppc box,
and I have heard of it running very stable on other people's boxen, so
why the mask?

Cheers,
//zhen
- --
John Davis
Gentoo Linux Developer
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen>

- ----
Knowledge can be more terrible than ignorance if you're powerless to
change your world.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/aJ6XZlASNRlGLUcRAirZAKCbsyHY88DI+kRLSRHlCPTqMjF6eACfSslI
LlH5zuucpVYpLeKgUKt0YC0=
=iico
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of gcc-3.2.3-r2[Scanned]

[Martin Schlemmer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 869 bytes --]

On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 19:49, John Davis wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi all:
> Does anyone know the masking status of gcc-3.2.3-r2? It has been ~* for
> quite some time. I know that it works fine on both my x86 and ppc box,
> and I have heard of it running very stable on other people's boxen, so
> why the mask?
> 

For some reason it breaks others boxes badly.  I have a -r3 here
that fix the static linking issues without the bad fix in -r2, as
well as the parser issues that -r2 also fixed.  Over here -r3
does an bootstrap and emerge system (ok, nptl based) fine, as
well as busy now with emerge gnome.  I will commit it toward
the end of the week/weekend after one or two more look overs.


Thanks,

-- 

Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of gcc-3.2.3-r2[Scanned]

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 552 bytes --]

On Wednesday 17 September 2003 16:41, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> For some reason it breaks others boxes badly.  I have a -r3 here
> that fix the static linking issues without the bad fix in -r2, as
> well as the parser issues that -r2 also fixed.  Over here -r3
> does an bootstrap and emerge system (ok, nptl based) fine, as
> well as busy now with emerge gnome.  I will commit it toward
> the end of the week/weekend after one or two more look overs.

are you talking 3.3.1 or 3.2.3 ?
zhen wants 3.2.3, i want 3.3.1 ... cant we have it all ? :(
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of gcc-3.2.3-r2[Scanned]

[Martin Schlemmer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 804 bytes --]

On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 22:48, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 September 2003 16:41, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > For some reason it breaks others boxes badly.  I have a -r3 here
> > that fix the static linking issues without the bad fix in -r2, as
> > well as the parser issues that -r2 also fixed.  Over here -r3
> > does an bootstrap and emerge system (ok, nptl based) fine, as
> > well as busy now with emerge gnome.  I will commit it toward
> > the end of the week/weekend after one or two more look overs.
> 
> are you talking 3.3.1 or 3.2.3 ?
> zhen wants 3.2.3, i want 3.3.1 ... cant we have it all ? :(

I was on crack here - should have been 3.3.1-r2.


Thanks,

-- 

Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of gcc-3.2.3-r2[Scanned]

[Martin Schlemmer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1020 bytes --]

On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 22:41, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 19:49, John Davis wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Hi all:
> > Does anyone know the masking status of gcc-3.2.3-r2? It has been ~* for
> > quite some time. I know that it works fine on both my x86 and ppc box,
> > and I have heard of it running very stable on other people's boxen, so
> > why the mask?
> > 
> 
> For some reason it breaks others boxes badly.  I have a -r3 here
> that fix the static linking issues without the bad fix in -r2, as
> well as the parser issues that -r2 also fixed.  Over here -r3
> does an bootstrap and emerge system (ok, nptl based) fine, as
> well as busy now with emerge gnome.  I will commit it toward
> the end of the week/weekend after one or two more look overs.
> 

Ok, I was on something here - should have been 3.3.1-r2


Thanks,

-- 

Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]