From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-6809-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 13198 invoked by uid 1002); 19 Sep 2003 15:43:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 16946 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2003 15:43:09 -0000
From: Patrick Lauer <gentoo@toso-digitals.de>
To: Zack Gilburd <klasikahl@gentoo.org>
Cc: vapier@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <200309162210.04858.klasikahl@gentoo.org>
References: <200309162132.01170.vapier@gentoo.org>
	 <200309162210.04858.klasikahl@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1063986188.11590.8.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 
Date: 19 Sep 2003 17:43:08 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] lsh (and liboop) on Gentoo
X-Archives-Salt: be887fc0-ba9f-4764-8115-7abe52651de8
X-Archives-Hash: 73d4da7d0ff82b74db2ba8300988c58c

On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 07:09, Zack Gilburd wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 September 2003 06:32 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > with all this openssh crap thats been happening today, i was wondering if
> > anyone made ebuilds for lsh (and thus liboop) for Gentoo ... i was looking
> > at liboop and they use the autotools pretty poorly imho ...
> 
> AFAIK, lsh is not secure, whatsoever.
You're right, lsh has the same type of error as ssh.
(possible root compromise)

http://lists.lysator.liu.se/pipermail/lsh-bugs/2003q3/000120.html

so at the moment securing a networked linux box is a bit of russian
roulette ...

I already posted a comment to bug  28971 (lsh ebuild) 




--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list