public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brad Laue <brad@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4.1 and GRP
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:59:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1063641562.12338.7.camel@Discovery.brad-x.com> (raw)

Greetings all,

A concern of mine about many Linux distributions is that in the long
haul between binary releases of a distribution, the packages included
with the release can become quite old. In Gentoo's case, if one GRP
installed their system nine months from now and emerge -u'd, they would
be faced with a considerable number of packages to update (I wouldn't be
surprised if it was all of them).

The Gentoo 1.4.1 release re-ignited my curiosity on this topic. Will
there be regular interim releases between major upgrades, or will
releases like these solely fix bugs?

If the latter, can a GRP ISO be created say, every two months? This
would only add ~500MB per architecture involved, since there wouldn't be
any need to archive the older versions of the ISO.

Realising that Gentoo is of course a source-based distribution, quickly
and easily installing the latest and greatest by using emerge -k, then
optimizing by rebuilding incrementally has surely sparked a great deal
of additional interest in the distribution.

What does everyone think?

Brad


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


             reply	other threads:[~2003-09-15 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-15 15:59 Brad Laue [this message]
2003-09-15 16:36 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4.1 and GRP Chris Gianelloni
2003-09-15 16:52 ` Luke-Jr
2003-09-15 17:08   ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-09-15 17:20     ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 17:48       ` Brian Jackson
2003-09-15 18:29         ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 21:01           ` Philippe Lafoucrière
     [not found]         ` <1063649926.13582.2.camel@Discovery.brad-x.com>
2003-09-16 21:20           ` Brian Jackson
2003-09-17 15:37             ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 18:04 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 18:30   ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 18:39     ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 18:53       ` Jon Portnoy
2003-09-15 19:05       ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 19:06         ` Jon Portnoy
2003-09-15 20:18           ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 21:16             ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-09-15 19:10         ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-16 16:34           ` Alexander Gretencord
2003-09-17  5:45             ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-09-15 18:38   ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-09-15 18:42     ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 21:09       ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-09-15 23:33 ` Sven Blumenstein
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-15 22:15 Thomas Schweikle
2003-09-15 22:49 ` donnie berkholz
2003-09-15 23:05   ` Marius Mauch
2003-09-16  3:54   ` Matt Thrailkill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1063641562.12338.7.camel@Discovery.brad-x.com \
    --to=brad@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox