From: Brad Laue <brad@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4.1 and GRP
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:59:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1063641562.12338.7.camel@Discovery.brad-x.com> (raw)
Greetings all,
A concern of mine about many Linux distributions is that in the long
haul between binary releases of a distribution, the packages included
with the release can become quite old. In Gentoo's case, if one GRP
installed their system nine months from now and emerge -u'd, they would
be faced with a considerable number of packages to update (I wouldn't be
surprised if it was all of them).
The Gentoo 1.4.1 release re-ignited my curiosity on this topic. Will
there be regular interim releases between major upgrades, or will
releases like these solely fix bugs?
If the latter, can a GRP ISO be created say, every two months? This
would only add ~500MB per architecture involved, since there wouldn't be
any need to archive the older versions of the ISO.
Realising that Gentoo is of course a source-based distribution, quickly
and easily installing the latest and greatest by using emerge -k, then
optimizing by rebuilding incrementally has surely sparked a great deal
of additional interest in the distribution.
What does everyone think?
Brad
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2003-09-15 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-15 15:59 Brad Laue [this message]
2003-09-15 16:36 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4.1 and GRP Chris Gianelloni
2003-09-15 16:52 ` Luke-Jr
2003-09-15 17:08 ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-09-15 17:20 ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 17:48 ` Brian Jackson
2003-09-15 18:29 ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 21:01 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
[not found] ` <1063649926.13582.2.camel@Discovery.brad-x.com>
2003-09-16 21:20 ` Brian Jackson
2003-09-17 15:37 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 18:04 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 18:30 ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 18:39 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 18:53 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-09-15 19:05 ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 19:06 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-09-15 20:18 ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 21:16 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-09-15 19:10 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-16 16:34 ` Alexander Gretencord
2003-09-17 5:45 ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-09-15 18:38 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-09-15 18:42 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 21:09 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-09-15 23:33 ` Sven Blumenstein
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-15 22:15 Thomas Schweikle
2003-09-15 22:49 ` donnie berkholz
2003-09-15 23:05 ` Marius Mauch
2003-09-16 3:54 ` Matt Thrailkill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1063641562.12338.7.camel@Discovery.brad-x.com \
--to=brad@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox