On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 00:50, George Shapovalov wrote:
> Well, not directly related to this issue, but related to gcc. So I'll reply to 
> this thread in the hope of catching attention of all parties touching gcc 
> ebuilds.
> 
> Please, do not add "ada" to gcc_lang definition in ebuilds, as per #25178!
> This is getting rediculous - the moment I clean-up ebuilds I see "ada" popping 
> in in a newer version :).

[ bla blah bla blah ]

:)

Sorry, forgot, and I am pretty sure whoever did not fix it for gcc-3.3.1
back then (and the bigger reason why I missed it).

Anyhow, thanks for catching it!


Thanks,

-- 

Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa