From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19593 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Sep 2003 20:16:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 3311 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2003 20:16:21 -0000 From: Martin Schlemmer Reply-To: azarah@gentoo.org To: vapier@gentoo.org Cc: Gentoo-Dev In-Reply-To: <200309051117.48485.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <200309050913.35962.vapier@gentoo.org> <3F58A457.70905@gentoo.org> <200309051117.48485.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-XYUOKWdAxePbrQFQzzxp" Message-Id: <1062792957.10805.15.camel@nosferatu.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 22:15:57 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masking glibc-2.3.2-r3 X-Archives-Salt: d37c5a70-5909-482a-9ace-9c0a57ff6908 X-Archives-Hash: 9d94f31e0202d5b0db4712e1726a9c10 --=-XYUOKWdAxePbrQFQzzxp Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 17:17, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 05 September 2003 10:57, Kumba wrote: > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > anyone have any qualms with me changing the masking on glibc-2.3.2-r3 > > > from KEYWORDS=3D"-*" to package.mask ? > > > ive been using it for quite sometime and was just about to update to > > > NPTL-0.57 (released like 2 days ago) when i realized i still inject t= he > > > latest unstable version of glibc so that my glibc's dont get screwed = up > > > ... i prefer to put masked stuff in package.mask and then unmask in > > > package.unmask ... -mike > > > > I actually have the 20030822 branch update for a glibc-2.3.2-r4 if you > > want me to put that into Portage. I thought Azarah might've gotten > > around to it by now, but he may be really busy. I've been using this > > -r4 prototype on sparc and x86 for about 2 weeks now w/o any issues so = far. >=20 > if it includes NPTL-0.57 i'd love you long time :) > the current branch doesnt seem to compile with 0.57 while 0.56 worked fin= e ... Yep, need the newer sources - working on it, but just need to be sure its ok before committing ... --=20 Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa --=-XYUOKWdAxePbrQFQzzxp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/WO79qburzKaJYLYRAqG9AJ9dSMZ7qC0B6Pfr77P9edCsgFwNNQCfTEhi mpaAwHv70aiMLyVOIUugf/Y= =s+K9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-XYUOKWdAxePbrQFQzzxp--