From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-6315-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 10744 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Sep 2003 15:51:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 21509 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 15:51:22 -0000
From: foser <foser@foser.dyn.warande.net>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <1062581290.3701.3.camel@localhost>
References: <1062581290.3701.3.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1062604622.3363.6.camel@rivendell>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 17:57:03 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mark binutils-2.14.90.0.6-r2 as stable?
X-Archives-Salt: c5252ac7-3f66-4e41-ae57-e8acce1da871
X-Archives-Hash: 2f761f485ec3da6eaeb3a3425fb7a123

On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:28, Stefan Jones wrote:
> I have tested on two x86 systems with different CFLAGS with bootstrap
> and emerge system. I saw no errors reported.

I don't think testing on 2 systems really is good enough for a core
package, it just needs it's time in ~ unless there are very good reasons
to push it.

- foser


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list