* [gentoo-dev] Mark binutils-2.14.90.0.6-r2 as stable?
@ 2003-09-03 9:28 Stefan Jones
2003-09-03 15:57 ` foser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Jones @ 2003-09-03 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Martin Schlemmer; +Cc: gentoo-dev
Martin,
I have tested on two x86 systems with different CFLAGS with bootstrap
and emerge system. I saw no errors reported.
Full report at:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27440
Shall I move that version of binutils to stable?
Stefan
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Mark binutils-2.14.90.0.6-r2 as stable?
2003-09-03 9:28 [gentoo-dev] Mark binutils-2.14.90.0.6-r2 as stable? Stefan Jones
@ 2003-09-03 15:57 ` foser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: foser @ 2003-09-03 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:28, Stefan Jones wrote:
> I have tested on two x86 systems with different CFLAGS with bootstrap
> and emerge system. I saw no errors reported.
I don't think testing on 2 systems really is good enough for a core
package, it just needs it's time in ~ unless there are very good reasons
to push it.
- foser
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-03 15:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-03 9:28 [gentoo-dev] Mark binutils-2.14.90.0.6-r2 as stable? Stefan Jones
2003-09-03 15:57 ` foser
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox