From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13447 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Sep 2003 15:48:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 26149 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 15:48:17 -0000 From: foser To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <3F523FFD.2050209@milsson.nu> References: <200308311129.14038.george@gentoo.org> <3F523FFD.2050209@milsson.nu> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1062604436.3363.2.camel@rivendell> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 17:53:57 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] What happend to portage speed? X-Archives-Salt: c74e0015-6527-4e3c-a8eb-4be8f994495a X-Archives-Hash: f7403006589724281daae1313a1d67e7 Portage just has gotten slower over time with the added functionality, especially removing a lot of files takes ages for me. I suppose extra checks and all that take time. - foser On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 20:35, John Nilsson wrote: > No > > George Shapovalov wrote: > > > On Sunday 31 August 2003 07:23, John Nilsson wrote: > > > >>Actually it seems most time is spent after each "...done" statement. > > > > Hm, do you by chance have a lot of binary packages you created in packages/All > > *and* you have fixpackages in your FEATURES in make.conf? > > > > George > > > > > > > > -- > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list