From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-6312-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 3320 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Sep 2003 09:30:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 7094 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 09:30:20 -0000
From: Stefan Jones <cretin@gentoo.org>
To: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Gentoo Linux
Message-Id: <1062581290.3701.3.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 10:28:10 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Mark binutils-2.14.90.0.6-r2 as stable?
X-Archives-Salt: 7172b7cc-0a22-4c16-bc7c-e6dbe8fa7af9
X-Archives-Hash: d6d0f43e7dfcb10aaad23c00b54c5b76

Martin,

I have tested on two x86 systems with different CFLAGS with bootstrap
and emerge system. I saw no errors reported.

Full report at:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27440

Shall I move that version of binutils to stable?

Stefan


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list