From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3438 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Aug 2003 22:45:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8724 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2003 22:45:43 -0000 From: foser To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <1062076911.3455.116.camel@rivendell> <200308281600.13232.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20030828194416.189ef484.spider@gentoo.org> <20030828230303.2cb6a611.spider@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1062110431.14186.6.camel@rivendell> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:40:31 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop X-Archives-Salt: 53b6af37-abee-4ae6-932b-008d1b62fd12 X-Archives-Hash: e27eb77aa2443a08d8e5235e22ce378c On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 23:21, dams@idm.fr wrote: > I also totally agree. > > What do the other think about that? Can we start with this as an accepted > thing, and try to be more precise on the other points? Well, i'm not against non-intrusive theming here and there (with caution). The hard part is too get a good artist who also sticks around for updates and improvements over time. So we can agree, but still get nowhere. But this discussion ends in all sorts of details, while there should be a focus on defining what a Desktop TLP would do. - foser -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list