From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19565 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Aug 2003 22:37:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 20747 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2003 22:37:14 -0000 From: foser To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20030828233453.07652b52.spider@gentoo.org> References: <200308281600.13232.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20030828194416.189ef484.spider@gentoo.org> <200308282014.34767.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> <20030828233453.07652b52.spider@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1062109922.14186.2.camel@rivendell> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:32:03 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop X-Archives-Salt: 1e535c15-bdab-4332-949e-8115fe183ef7 X-Archives-Hash: c68dbf15e552fe06afae8ae9c0676d46 On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 23:34, Spider wrote: > begin quote > On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 22:46:34 +0200 > dams@idm.fr wrote: > > > > it shows... It shows that I applied some of my leader rule : come with > > a already built idea, let people be desapointed, let them argue, > > fight, so that they defend their point of views, and collect the > > conclusions. > > > I should point out that this is also discouraged against because it > fosters an "aggressive culture" and dissent within development teams, > and may also undermine faith, whereas the method of carefully selecting > points one at a time for discussion will work far smoother and with less > irregularities, however may not be as immediate? And i very much doubt that was your initial intent. If you really had done that on purpose, you would never have mentioned it. Nice try. - foser -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list