From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17112 invoked by uid 1002); 24 Aug 2003 22:04:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 18222 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2003 22:04:24 -0000 From: Grant Goodyear To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20030824105939.5cd3fe62.spider@gentoo.org> References: <20030823210429.57e7e85c.genone@genone.de> <20030823192037.ALLYOURBASEAREBELONGTOUS.A11963@bla.fasel.org> <200308232306.55513.luke-jr@gentoo.org> <20030824105939.5cd3fe62.spider@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-x4OvYJWLJ/edgDbKBzGg" Message-Id: <1061762458.16847.17.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 18:00:58 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ? X-Archives-Salt: d482d827-747e-49c6-866a-37955836aa7e X-Archives-Hash: 51966932d9897faa34bc77aae716f457 --=-x4OvYJWLJ/edgDbKBzGg Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Shouldn't system be as close to a POSIX compliant Unix as possible? Or > perhaps LSB? If others want minimalism, let them create their own > profiles?(Its not difficult. really). I don't have a problem with that argument in principle, but I don't know what POSIX or LSB requires. Can somebody provide a comparison against our current default profile (noting that python is _not_ negotiable *Grin*)? -g2boojum- --=20 Grant Goodyear --=-x4OvYJWLJ/edgDbKBzGg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/STWZptxxUuD2W3YRAoGcAJ9pswPUyuI5Mi65NS0df+PCVrwt2wCfZzdb PTEh6NKNbF4FgyeZnzNPpCY= =LaS1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-x4OvYJWLJ/edgDbKBzGg--