From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@gentoo.org>
To: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@gentoo.org>
Cc: Yuri Enshin <kot@formoza-centre.ru>, Gentoo-Dev <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ?
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:15:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1061712914.13460.20.camel@nosferatu.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200308232316.08493.luke-jr@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4054 bytes --]
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 01:16, Luke-Jr wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This seems to be opposite of my reply I just sent :)
> I would agree that man-pages (and maybe man also, but many packages depend on
> it without mentioning it in DEPEND) should probably not be in system (along
> with all other documents). In fact, it would probably be a good idea to make
> a 'man' and 'info' USE flag and only install manpages/infopages when they are
> set.
Man pages is an integrate part of a system in my opinion - how anyhow
are you going to tell them to RTFM if not there :P
> ext2/ext3 are still considered Linux native, so that may be justification for
> their inclusion in system, if not for the fact that reiserfs is a bad idea
> for a /boot partition... I wouldn't have any objection to their removal from
> system, though.
e2fsprogs provide /sbin/fsck ... 8)
> If rsync is in system, it probably should be removed. Portage could quite
> easilly just install it when the user tries to sync if need be.
So we devs are going to start moaning because we have rsync installed ?
> hdparm, fbset may also be neccesary for system usage in some cases. I would
> agree that 'less' does not belong in system, though.
Hmm, i would not agree 100% 8)
------------------------------
$ PAGER=foo man gcc
sh: line 1: foo: command not found
Error executing formatting or display command.
System command (cd /usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3/man &&
(echo ".ll 11.1i"; echo ".nr LL 11.1i"; echo ".pl 1100i"; /bin/gunzip -c
'/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3/man/man1/gcc.1.gz'; echo;
echo ".pl \n(nlu+10") | /usr/bin/gtbl | /usr/bin/nroff -Tlatin1 -c
-mandoc | foo) exited with status 127.
No manual entry for gcc
-------------------------------
But then I guess man pages is not needed, right :) Question is, is
'more' needed there - that I would say no, but then I feel 'less' is
more the default ...
> To exclude network related programs from system, one would have to modify
> baselayout to use the nonetwork initlevel by default logically, and I don't
> think that would be too simple (and might require a 'network' USE flag).
>
In general the 'system' profile have everything that should be needed to
get a system functioning at a minimal level, with then a few extras that
we found to be annoying in general. Take perl - sure its big, but
automake is a perl script ..... is automake required on a Gentoo box ?
All in all, most things in there is after careful thought - and should
be removed after 10x more of 'careful thought'.
>
> On Saturday 23 August 2003 08:34 pm, Yuri Enshin wrote:
> > Hmm... May be, extend your question?
> > Some users know all about linux, so no reason to include man and
> > man-pages in system.
> > Some users never change default console font or keyboard layout, so no
> > reason to include kbd or console-tools in system.
> > Some users have no ext2/ext3 partiotions, so no reason to include in
> > system e2fsprogs.
> > Some users never use 'emerge sync' (only download snapshots), so no
> > reason to include rsync.
> > Some users never use less, hdparm, fbset...
> > Some users have no network on computer at all, so no reason to include
> > any network related programs in system.
> > I can continue this list.
> >
> > The reason for dhcpcd *in* system, IMHO: support for dhcp client - part
> > of universal, standart set of full-functional network-ready computer.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
> - --
> Luke-Jr
> Developer, Gentoo Linux
> http://www.gentoo.org/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE/R/W0Zl/BHdU+lYMRAvAHAJ93CIljUzyPAs2Mrk3XcOhcfqcX6gCgj/Be
> AwTJs10N232qrdxS4XmPSUQ=
> =VCT1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
--
Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-24 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-23 19:04 [gentoo-dev] reason for dhcpcd in system profile ? Marius Mauch
2003-08-23 19:20 ` Wolfram Schlich
2003-08-23 20:23 ` Daniel Armyr
2003-08-23 21:20 ` Wolfram Schlich
2003-08-24 6:08 ` Daniel Armyr
2003-08-23 23:06 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-24 3:21 ` A. Craig West
2003-08-24 8:59 ` Spider
2003-08-24 16:32 ` Alec Berryman
2003-08-24 16:44 ` Spider
2003-08-24 18:16 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-08-24 18:40 ` Alec Berryman
2003-08-24 18:55 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-24 18:47 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-08-24 19:05 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-24 19:03 ` Marius Mauch
2003-08-25 0:44 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-25 0:48 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-24 22:00 ` Grant Goodyear
2003-08-25 3:07 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-23 19:29 ` Stewart Honsberger
2003-08-23 20:29 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-08-24 7:22 ` Stewart Honsberger
2003-08-24 8:33 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-08-24 15:09 ` Brad Laue
2003-08-24 20:41 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-08-23 21:25 ` Norberto BENSA
2003-08-23 20:34 ` Yuri Enshin
2003-08-23 21:27 ` Norberto BENSA
2003-08-23 23:16 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-24 8:15 ` Martin Schlemmer [this message]
2003-08-25 2:18 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-25 4:24 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-08-25 4:46 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-08-25 13:46 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-25 16:27 ` William Hubbs
2003-08-23 23:08 ` Lloyd D Budd
2003-08-24 4:28 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-08-24 14:14 ` Marius Mauch
2003-08-24 14:33 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-08-24 15:09 ` Paul de Vrieze
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-24 20:40 Spider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1061712914.13460.20.camel@nosferatu.lan \
--to=azarah@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=kot@formoza-centre.ru \
--cc=luke-jr@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox