From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: Chris Bainbridge <C.J.Bainbridge@ed.ac.uk>
Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Why should copyright assignment be a requirement?
Date: 21 Aug 2003 07:22:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1061464956.412.123.camel@vertigo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200308211114.48952.C.J.Bainbridge@ed.ac.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 680 bytes --]
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 06:14, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> I am unclear how copyright assignment is being done at the moment? I have
> never been asked to assign copyright for any contributed ebuilds, and I have
> never signed a contract with GTI, as far as I am concerned I still have
> copyright on those GPL ebuilds.
As I see it, if you only had a Copyright GTI in your header, then you
gave up your copyright. In fact, I have done this myself on quite a few
ebuilds I submitted before becoming a developer. If this is incorrect,
please set me straight, but I believe that would be why you have no been
contacted.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Developer, Gentoo Linux
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-21 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-21 4:09 [gentoo-dev] Why should copyright assignment be a requirement? Paul
2003-08-21 4:14 ` Mike Frysinger
2003-08-21 4:34 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-08-21 4:17 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-08-21 4:51 ` Troy Dack
2003-08-21 5:09 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-08-21 7:00 ` Daniel Robbins
2003-08-21 10:52 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-08-21 5:11 ` Mike Gardiner
2003-08-21 7:04 ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul
2003-08-21 5:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Gardiner
2003-08-21 5:16 ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul
2003-08-21 5:46 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-08-21 6:41 ` Paul
2003-08-21 6:50 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-08-21 7:37 ` Paul
2003-08-21 10:14 ` Chris Bainbridge
2003-08-21 11:22 ` Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2003-08-21 17:56 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-08-21 18:48 ` Chris Bainbridge
2003-08-21 19:31 ` Brian Jackson
2003-08-22 1:36 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-08-22 4:45 ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul
2003-08-22 13:16 ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-21 10:16 ` [gentoo-dev] " Spider
2003-08-21 8:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " Sven Vermeulen
2003-08-21 9:04 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-08-21 13:49 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-21 18:00 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-08-22 0:35 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-22 0:47 ` Lloyd D Budd
2003-08-22 1:15 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-22 13:20 ` Lloyd D Budd
2003-08-21 13:19 ` Luke-Jr
2003-08-21 22:42 ` [gentoo-dev] copyright thread summary? Owen Gunden
2003-08-22 2:43 ` [gentoo-dev] Summary: "Why should copyright assignment be a requirement?" Alec Berryman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1061464956.412.123.camel@vertigo \
--to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
--cc=C.J.Bainbridge@ed.ac.uk \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox