From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12685 invoked by uid 1002); 15 Aug 2003 12:09:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 16674 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2003 12:09:25 -0000 From: William Kenworthy Reply-To: billk@iinet.net.au To: Georgi Georgiev Cc: gentoo-dev List In-Reply-To: <20030815095406.GA17581%chutz@gg3.net> References: <1060890969.4386.34.camel@localhost> <20030814225835.74ee794b.spider@gentoo.org> <20030814222026.GA16720@force.stwing.upenn.edu> <005801c36311$d18fec50$9865fea9@herakles> <20030815095406.GA17581%chutz@gg3.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1060947979.6937.2.camel@rattus.Localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 15 Aug 2003 19:46:19 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's X-Archives-Salt: 90615dd1-9965-454d-8b5b-0fbc6fb43546 X-Archives-Hash: a3b2ce046c34357e14a2d39c18a64ae1 I agree with the negative connotation snapshop, but so is a forever rc candidate. How about checkpoint like the database boys do? - its prob the most correct measure of gentoos status. BillK On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 17:54, Georgi Georgiev wrote: > On 15/08/2003 at 11:44:21(+0200), Camille Huot used 1.0K just to say: > > I associate the word "snapshots" with something incomplete. That's because the > word is mostly used by projects that offer cvs snapshots. I agree that it is > the most correct name, even though it may not be the most descriptive one. -- William Kenworthy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list