From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11226 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Aug 2003 21:14:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 24019 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2003 21:14:52 -0000 From: FRLinux Reply-To: frlinux@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev ML In-Reply-To: <1060784410.7503.29.camel@biproc> References: <1060781901.7508.17.camel@biproc> <1060783729.4133.42.camel@vertigo> <1060784410.7503.29.camel@biproc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Message-Id: <1060809305.3784.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 13 Aug 2003 22:15:05 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] "Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)" X-Archives-Salt: 07b11973-50ae-4f2b-83df-1fc6b8fc4e0f X-Archives-Hash: 45a0730cc7c679e1c110268684402cba On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 15:20, Philippe Lafoucrière wrote: > totally agree ! Btw, gnumeric speed is related to version apparently, > and they didn't use the official gentoo (patched) kernel ("The same > 2.4.21 source was copied to all machines"). This sux !! Well i don't think this sucks, keeping at least consistency on the kernel between the 3 distributions is a good idea. Now, that being said, they seriously fsck'd up the rest of the test and optimisations. I don't use specific gentoo kernels on my boxes, this is a personal choice made about a year ago and actually since 2.6, i don't use 2.4 anymore on personal machines (my laptop and my workstation). Steph -- Mail sent on Gentoo 1.4rc3 k2.6-test3 AMD 2600+ http://frlinux.net - frlinux@frlinux.net http://gentoofr.org - Portail Francais sur Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list