public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: FRLinux <frlinux@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev ML <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] "Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)"
Date: 13 Aug 2003 22:15:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1060809305.3784.2.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1060784410.7503.29.camel@biproc>


On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 15:20, Philippe Lafoucrière wrote:
> totally agree ! Btw, gnumeric speed is related to version apparently,
> and they didn't use the official gentoo (patched) kernel ("The same
> 2.4.21 source was copied to all machines"). This sux !!

Well i don't think this sucks, keeping at least consistency on the
kernel between the 3 distributions is a good idea. Now, that being said,
they seriously fsck'd up the rest of the test and optimisations.

I don't use specific gentoo kernels on my boxes, this is a personal
choice made about a year ago and actually since 2.6, i don't use 2.4
anymore on personal machines (my laptop and my workstation).

Steph
-- 
Mail sent on Gentoo 1.4rc3 k2.6-test3 AMD 2600+
http://frlinux.net - frlinux@frlinux.net
http://gentoofr.org - Portail Francais sur Gentoo Linux




--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-13 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-13 13:38 [gentoo-dev] "Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)" Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-08-13 14:07 ` brett holcomb
2003-08-13 15:03   ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-08-13 16:15     ` Alan
2003-08-13 20:30       ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-13 14:08 ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-13 14:12   ` Brad Laue
2003-08-13 14:20   ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-08-13 14:25     ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-08-13 14:32     ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-13 16:17       ` Alan
2003-08-13 16:22         ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-08-13 20:35           ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-13 20:32         ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-14 10:02           ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-08-13 21:15     ` FRLinux [this message]
2003-08-13 22:49       ` William Kenworthy
2003-08-14  2:04         ` Brian Jackson
2003-08-14 10:10         ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-08-14 12:30         ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-14 16:59           ` William Kenworthy
2003-08-14 17:38             ` [gentoo-dev] "Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentooapproach)" matt c
2003-08-14 19:22         ` [gentoo-dev] "Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)" FRLinux
2003-08-14 23:01           ` William Kenworthy
2003-08-13 14:24 ` David Holm
2003-08-13 14:28   ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-08-13 16:16     ` Eric Olinger
2003-08-13 19:00   ` Jon Portnoy
2003-08-13 20:02     ` Mike Frysinger
2003-08-14  1:07       ` [gentoo-dev] 'Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)' donnie berkholz
2003-08-14  1:13         ` Jon Portnoy
2003-08-14 11:01         ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-13 14:34 ` [gentoo-dev] "Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)" Stuart Herbert
2003-08-13 14:34 ` Svyatogor
2003-08-13 17:46 ` Adam Porich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1060809305.3784.2.camel@localhost \
    --to=frlinux@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox