public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Update on the 23.0 profiles
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 17:06:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10606960.T7Z3S40VBb@noumea> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1565 bytes --]

Hi all, 

so here's a small update on the state of the 23.0 profiles:

* For all arches, the 23.0 profiles are now marked at the same stability status
  (mostly for the CI and pkgcheck) as before the 17.x profiles. Most 17.x profiles
  have been downgraded to "exp".

* All stage downloads (with the exception of hppa, where our builder is a tad slow)
  are now based on 23.0.

* For all ISO / other boot media, the specs have been changed as of today, so that
  the next succeeding build will also be based on 23.0. 
  The new builds need testing, so if you happen to have suitable hardware around...

* With that we can nail down the timetable for the next steps:
  2024-06-06 (in 2 months): deprecation of the 17.x profiles; binpkg builders for
     the 17.x profiles are stopped
  2025-06-06 (1 year later): removal of the 17.x profiles from profiles.desc
  ????-??-?? (when infra has moved :o): removal of the 17.x profile trees in gentoo.git

Comments and feedback welcome. I would really prefer to *not* extend the time until
deprecation though, since maintenance (and CPU time) goes down as soon as we don't
build twice the amount of packages...

In general, our installation ISO need in my opinion some review regarding the package
set and the detailed build instructions. As long as they work that is not really
urgent though.

Cheers,
Andreas


-- 
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfridge@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer 
(council, comrel, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-06 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-06 15:06 Andreas K. Huettel [this message]
2024-04-07  2:03 ` [gentoo-dev] Update on the 23.0 profiles Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-07 12:35   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-07 12:51     ` Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-07 13:07       ` Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-08  6:40         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2024-04-08 12:00         ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-08 15:16           ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-07 14:48       ` Michał Górny
2024-04-07 21:09         ` Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-08  0:22           ` Alex Boag-Munroe
2024-04-08  3:07             ` Michał Górny
2024-04-07 11:35 ` Florian Schmaus
2024-04-07 12:31   ` [gentoo-dev] " Madhu
2024-04-07 13:27     ` Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-11 16:37       ` [gentoo-dev] " Madhu
2024-04-07 12:32   ` [gentoo-dev] " Andreas K. Huettel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10606960.T7Z3S40VBb@noumea \
    --to=dilfridge@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox