From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24713 invoked by uid 1002); 11 Aug 2003 23:40:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 16014 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2003 23:40:23 -0000 From: Lisa Marie Seelye To: Michael Cummings Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org, weeve@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20030811191207.GC32294@enki.datanode.net> References: <1060130502.15424.1.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> <1060622367.1721.22.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> <20030811191207.GC32294@enki.datanode.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gSgSdk33YtE87/VLWkd3" Message-Id: <1060645221.1719.42.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 11 Aug 2003 19:40:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable? X-Archives-Salt: b60aca08-c872-4430-a00c-2b248a6fef39 X-Archives-Hash: 6086fb27f09a9ebab1217b3029695285 --=-gSgSdk33YtE87/VLWkd3 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 15:12, Michael Cummings wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:19:28PM -0400, Lisa Marie Seelye wrote: > > Well since I haven't heard anything from the non-x86 people I'm going t= o > > bump 2.8-r2 to stable on those arches and 2.9 to x86 (I'll post a forma= l > > announcement after I get 2.10 in). >=20 > *eek!!* Alright, alright. Guess it is a bit much to ask for feedback on a mail list. --=20 Regards, -Lisa --=-gSgSdk33YtE87/VLWkd3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/OClly0a1Vh5Jb8URAtb0AJ9j5ZNAxN9SAsYkveZLyq77co5r9QCgqv9x fCIjiAYjShGRmI5kHgXnbp0= =3H+3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gSgSdk33YtE87/VLWkd3--