From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10667 invoked by uid 1002); 11 Aug 2003 17:16:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 22160 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2003 17:16:50 -0000 From: Lisa Marie Seelye To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1060130502.15424.1.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> References: <1060130502.15424.1.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-omrB32YKssRAOv5gWNDD" Message-Id: <1060622367.1721.22.camel@lisa.thedoh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 11 Aug 2003 13:19:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable? X-Archives-Salt: 9eed5b8c-f8ba-4ba6-8fcd-d9813ebaebe0 X-Archives-Hash: 62fc7ea8e503419b69cbac74d0736b50 --=-omrB32YKssRAOv5gWNDD Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 20:41, Lisa Marie Seelye wrote: > Well guys? Anyone brave enough to use distcc-2.8-r2 on a non-x86 arch?=20 > I think its time to get those other arches up to date. Let me know if > there are any problems or if I can bump them up! Well since I haven't heard anything from the non-x86 people I'm going to bump 2.8-r2 to stable on those arches and 2.9 to x86 (I'll post a formal announcement after I get 2.10 in). --=20 Regards, -Lisa --=-omrB32YKssRAOv5gWNDD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQA/N9Afy0a1Vh5Jb8URAnq1AKDPxeX4hItgS7WVucfXxK31c7N7IwCY4sBF GdwRHZh9D33MCLaCBzaIXg== =cKzV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-omrB32YKssRAOv5gWNDD--