> 2) Tangental to the issue above, we've already talked about placing things > like GPG keys on the web site in XML format and pulling the other info (dev > name, location, projects, etc.) in via XML as well. Why is the fingerd > solution a better one? Items on the web site are updated hourly. I can't > think of too many cases where that type of freshness isn't timely enough. Speaking of which, there had also been talk of adding gpg keys, etcetera, to each dev's ldap data. I'm fairly agnostic about having fingerd running, but I do agree that we should try to centralize that data as much as possible. Best, g2boojum -- Grant Goodyear