[gentoo-dev] Re: [grsec] Gentoo Grsecurity Poll

[Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>]

Brad, 

Thanks for responding your blessing was the one I wanted to see the most
before jumping into this. We got a fair amount of feedback from various
people using both grsec1 & grsec2 and everybody was for a pure grsec
only kernel. 

To meet the needs of everybody my initial plan will be to add both
2.4.21.1.9.11 and 2.4.21.2.0_rc2 unless you have an _rc3 planned for 2.0
in the next few days and then removing 1.9 when you deem 2.0 as stable.

Supported arches will be x86, sparc, sparc64, alpha, parisc, and ppc

On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 13:21, spender@grsecurity.net wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:48:36PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > 
> > Gentoo Linux includes support for grsecurity in nearly every kernel that
> > we have. Unfortunately the patch level is not always as up2date as Brad's
> > code due to the many other patches that are included, however what I'm
> > wondering here is do the Gentoo users want the option of merging a
> > vanilla-kernel with just "one" patch applied. It would be called
> > grsecurity-sources. I would like to use the grsec2 series for this so we
> > can help Brad debug and get it to a stable level.
> 
> I would definitely like this.  I could give them official stampings 
> then.  This weekend I might throw some packages of current cvs of grsec 
> and gradm up on the website.  I'd like to get a group of people together 
> so that for every release I can offer some packages in different formats 
> of grsecurity and gradm.  I'd also like to have a package that would 
> work on most ide-based servers that wouldn't have module support and 
> thus would have KERNEXEC enabled.
> 
> -Brad
-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux Developer (Hardened)


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list