From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11764 invoked by uid 1002); 6 Aug 2003 22:46:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 10559 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2003 22:46:19 -0000 From: Ned Ludd Reply-To: solar@gentoo.org To: grsecurity@grsecurity.net, gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Developer (Hardened) Message-Id: <1060210115.25885.63.camel@simple> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 06 Aug 2003 18:48:36 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Grsecurity Poll X-Archives-Salt: 33890af2-a6d9-4dac-ad1a-74074c62c8c1 X-Archives-Hash: 26bb3b0c8096f163a2c89e297c98aa36 Gentoo Linux includes support for grsecurity in nearly every kernel that we have. Unfortunately the patch level is not always as up2date as Brad's code due to the many other patches that are included, however what I'm wondering here is do the Gentoo users want the option of merging a vanilla-kernel with just "one" patch applied. It would be called grsecurity-sources. I would like to use the grsec2 series for this so we can help Brad debug and get it to a stable level. Comments, suggestions and feedback are welcome. PS: grsec is also used on our production servers, sourceforge also uses grsec in a production environment. -- Ned Ludd Gentoo Linux Developer (Hardened) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list