From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-5331-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 7091 invoked by uid 1002); 6 Aug 2003 00:41:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 26172 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2003 00:41:48 -0000
From: Lisa Marie Seelye <lisa@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-N3xEBweHv5n0jdAOnHqv"
Message-Id: <1060130502.15424.1.camel@lisa.thedoh.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 
Date: 05 Aug 2003 20:41:42 -0400
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable?
X-Archives-Salt: fcabd131-ffa2-4e63-a301-d53a7ba0313b
X-Archives-Hash: 6f91ef2034c29f0516289224c7af909e

--=-N3xEBweHv5n0jdAOnHqv
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well guys?  Anyone brave enough to use distcc-2.8-r2 on a non-x86 arch?=20
I think its time to get those other arches up to date.  Let me know if
there are any problems or if I can bump them up!


--=20
Regards,
-Lisa
<Vix ulla tam iniqua pax, quin bello vel aequissimo sit potior>

--=-N3xEBweHv5n0jdAOnHqv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/ME7Gy0a1Vh5Jb8URAmi8AKC/2EHzsptIEhurH9UHBNNsqvan9ACfRga0
AXYU++0Vx3H5dJiF377rNTQ=
=Je3k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-N3xEBweHv5n0jdAOnHqv--