Re: [gentoo-dev] Bleeding Edge Package Compile Failures

[Martin Schlemmer <azarah@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1115 bytes --]

On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 03:34, Kumba wrote:

> //--------------------------
> =sys-libs/pam-0.75-r11
> 

Works fine here - check your C[XX]FLAGS.

> //--------------------------
> =net-libs/liblockfile-1.03
> 

Fixed in -r1.

> //--------------------------
> =sys-apps/modutils-2.4.25
> =sys-apps/module-init-tools-0.9.12-r1
> 

Same issue, ill look into it.


> //--------------------------
> =sys-apps/parted-1.6.5
> 
> Notes: Using sys-apps/parted-1.6.5-r1, this problem does not occur. 
> However, -r1 of parted is not yet marked stable or even unstable on x86.
>

Mark it unstable (or stable if -r0 is such).

> //--------------------------
> =net-analyzer/tcpdump-3.7.2
> 

Seems like an issue with the gcc in question's macro parser.  I
will look into this.


> 
> So anyone got any ideas on all this?  That's not half bad for ~207 
> packages.  Some of these I don't think are gcc-3.3 issues, but one never 
> knows (like the pam issue).
> 


Cheers,

-- 

Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]