From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-5071-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 10333 invoked by uid 1002); 27 Jul 2003 11:58:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 9311 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2003 11:58:21 -0000
From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: Troy Dack <tad@gentoo.org>
Cc: method@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <3F235178.3020905@gentoo.org>
References: <20030726T195555Z_B95E00150000@gentoo.org>
	 <3F235178.3020905@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1059307064.24874.52.camel@vertigo>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 
Date: 27 Jul 2003 07:57:44 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new category - policies
X-Archives-Salt: 73590596-139b-43fc-9e6f-f67025e62e08
X-Archives-Hash: 562fa1e1cc2a02ff1aa8051f17254603

I think sec-policy would be a bit more descriptive, yet still short
enough to work easily.  Comments?

On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 00:13, Troy Dack wrote:
> sec-pol

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Developer, Gentoo Linux


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list